2014
DOI: 10.1021/cb500726b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing the Selectivity of p300 by Acetyl-CoA Modulation of Histone Acetylation

Abstract: Determining how histone acetylation is regulated is vital for treating the many diseases associated with its misregulation, including heart disease, neurological disorders, and cancer. We have previously reported that acetyl-CoA levels alter p300 histone acetylation in a site-specific manner in vitro. Here we further investigate how changing acetyl-CoA concentrations alter the histone acetylation pattern by altering p300 specificity. Interestingly, these changes are not a simple global change in acetylation, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probe labeling for almost all proteins was concentration-dependent and not saturatable, as expected for a non-enzymatic reaction (Figure 2b) (Olia et al, 2015). Of note, robust labeling was observed even at 100 μM which lies in the range of cellular acetyl-CoA levels (estimated 20–200 μM) (Henry et al, 2015). Using competition studies, we found that labeling of proteins by thioester 1 was strongly impeded by pre-incubating lysates with excess acetyl-CoA (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probe labeling for almost all proteins was concentration-dependent and not saturatable, as expected for a non-enzymatic reaction (Figure 2b) (Olia et al, 2015). Of note, robust labeling was observed even at 100 μM which lies in the range of cellular acetyl-CoA levels (estimated 20–200 μM) (Henry et al, 2015). Using competition studies, we found that labeling of proteins by thioester 1 was strongly impeded by pre-incubating lysates with excess acetyl-CoA (Figure 2c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand whether malonyl-CoA’s effects on glycolytic enzymes may stem from covalent non-enzymatic malonylation, we performed parallel assessments of GAPDH malonylation and activity as a function of time. Time-dependent enzyme activity loss was minimized by performing these analyses at 200 μM, which likely represents the upper range of physiologically relevant malonyl-CoA concentrations (Henry et al, 2015; Tokutake et al, 2012; Tokutake et al, 2010). Consistent with a covalent inhibition mechanism, malonyl-CoA reduces GAPDH activity in a time-dependent manner (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, both PLOD1 and PLOD3 expression were downregulated when treated with the CBP/P300 inhibitor, but PLOD1 expression was increased in unstimulated fibroblast when P300 and CBP was depleted by esiRNA. In some circumstances C646 can enhance P300-induced acetylation, and also its specificity toward P300/CBP is under debate (59). Therefore, the discrepancy between inhibitor and knockdown effects on PLOD1 and PLOD3 might be related to such issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the concentration of acetyl-CoA (or the acetyl-CoA/CoA ratio) does not only determine the enzymatic activity of KATs, but also alters their specificity. Thus, KATs like E1A binding protein p300 (EP300) and CREB binding protein (CREBBP, best known as CBP) exhibit distinct Hill values (i.e., different degrees of cooperativity) at varying acetyl-CoA levels, meaning that their selectivity (i.e., their preference to acetylate distinct lysine residues) changes (Denisov and Sligar, 2012;Henry et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%