2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1963734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing the Regulation for Regulating the Change: Innovation ‐ Driven Regulatory Developments in Italy: Smart Grids, Smart Metering and E‐Mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an increasing agreement in the literature that current regulation is unlikely to meet the new challenges raised by "smart" technologies (Lo Schiavo et al, 2013). This might be explained by three main orders of reasons.…”
Section: Why Should Regulation Evolve?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is an increasing agreement in the literature that current regulation is unlikely to meet the new challenges raised by "smart" technologies (Lo Schiavo et al, 2013). This might be explained by three main orders of reasons.…”
Section: Why Should Regulation Evolve?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barriers and uncertainties surrounding the implementation of SGs call for an explicit support of the initial investments (Lo Schiavo et al, 2013;Pérez-Arriaga, 2010). Regulation should, therefore, evolve in order to incentivize the deployment of these technologies without creating economic rents.…”
Section: Why Should Regulation Evolve?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the importance of smart grid technologies as a means to modernise the network and provide vital economic and social benefits is widely recognised [16]. Even though these smart solutions are generally deemed highly beneficial due to their potential to defer or avoid costly investments in capital intensive assets, they can also lead to additional cost trade-offs associated with higher operational costs (e.g., DR payments) and increased power losses and emissions compared with traditional networks with upgraded lines and substations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%