2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing the history of anaphylaxis mortality statistics through the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases–11

Abstract: We review the history of the classification and coding changes for anaphylaxis and provide current and perspective information in the field. In 2012, an analysis of Brazilian data demonstrated undernotification of anaphylaxis-related deaths because of the difficulties of coding using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. This work triggered strategic international actions supported by the Joint Allergy Academies and the International Classification of Diseases World Health Organization (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If criterion A or B were used, PPV was 67.3%. 40 In a population-based analysis of ED visits in Florida 2005 to 2006, 34 an algorithm (Harduar-Morano) incorporating a specific combination of ICD-9-CM codes of signs and symptoms in anaphylaxis and ICD-9-CM 995.2, 995.3, or 995.4 codes or E-code E905x, identified 58% more anaphylaxis cases than by using ICD-9-CM codes for anaphylactic shock alone. The Harduar-Morano algorithm has been employed in subsequent studies to identify anaphylaxis cases using ICD coding structures.…”
Section: Mitigation Strategies To Improve Anaphylaxis Case Identificamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If criterion A or B were used, PPV was 67.3%. 40 In a population-based analysis of ED visits in Florida 2005 to 2006, 34 an algorithm (Harduar-Morano) incorporating a specific combination of ICD-9-CM codes of signs and symptoms in anaphylaxis and ICD-9-CM 995.2, 995.3, or 995.4 codes or E-code E905x, identified 58% more anaphylaxis cases than by using ICD-9-CM codes for anaphylactic shock alone. The Harduar-Morano algorithm has been employed in subsequent studies to identify anaphylaxis cases using ICD coding structures.…”
Section: Mitigation Strategies To Improve Anaphylaxis Case Identificamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with other factors, these changes may have influenced the trends of electronically reported frequencies across time. The new ICD-11 coding system, which will come into effect on January 1, 2022, again modifies anaphylaxis reg-DOI: 10.1159/000507445 istration, and it was shown to further increase the accuracy and sensitivity of anaphylaxis identification [4]. The adoption of ICD-11 will improve the number of anaphylaxis episodes correctly identified and coded [4], and it is therefore expected to influence the epidemiological measures identified by coding methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In June 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center (WHO CC) for the Scientific Classification of Allergic and Hypersensitivity Diseases was established at the University Hospital of Montpellier, headed by Tanno and Demoly. 1 This designation is the result of recognition by the WHO of all the efforts of the ALLERGY in ICD-11 initiative [2][3][4][5][6] and is intended to provide academic, research, and scientific support to the WHO in the implementation, refinement, and maintenance of the WHO Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC) in the areas of our expertise. WHO CCs are institutions designated by the Director-General of the WHO and endorsed by the national minister of health to carry out activities in support of the WHO programs, such as communicable diseases, nutrition, mental health, occupational health, among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%