2021
DOI: 10.2147/amep.s334594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Student Perception of an Online Integrated Structured Clinical Examination During the COVID-19 Pandemic [Letter]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hazell highlights that mock examinations themselves reduces exam stress among students beyond exam format (in-person or online). 2 In our majority online examination-naïve participants, it is possible that the experience which combines a mock examination and virtual platform use will improve overall exam anxiety. However, the change scores in Questions 5 and 6 in Table 2 specifically address the online nature of assessments and we had asked two versions of these questions – “If you do not do well” in Question 5 and “If you do well to” in Question 6 to parse the relevance of the examination outcome of students sitting these high stakes examinations if they were indeed conducted online.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazell highlights that mock examinations themselves reduces exam stress among students beyond exam format (in-person or online). 2 In our majority online examination-naïve participants, it is possible that the experience which combines a mock examination and virtual platform use will improve overall exam anxiety. However, the change scores in Questions 5 and 6 in Table 2 specifically address the online nature of assessments and we had asked two versions of these questions – “If you do not do well” in Question 5 and “If you do well to” in Question 6 to parse the relevance of the examination outcome of students sitting these high stakes examinations if they were indeed conducted online.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%