Changing societal and executives' values: their impact on corporate governance

Lichtenstein, Scott; Dade, Pat

doi:10.1504/ijbge.2007.012611

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Birla Committee, 2000; Friedman, 1970), there is always a nagging suspicion that the executive may siphon off some part of the created wealth through excessive rewards to themselves and thus denying transmission of all created wealth to its rightful owners, i.e. shareholders (Lichtenstein and Dade, 2007; O'Brien, 2006).…”

Section: Corporate Governance In Indiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Hindu philosophy: bridging corporate governance and CSR

Sharma

Agarwal²,

Ketola

2009

Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight how fast the divide between the good corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) is declining. The concepts covered under CG and the areas covered under CSR are no longer distinctive. Both the philosophies advocate doing good and disclosing the good done.Design/methodology/approachThe study does a brief survey of Indian mythology to make its point clear that Indian philosophy is positive and it inculcates positive values in Indians, which influence their socially responsible behaviour. The study further analyses the annual reports of 50 Indian private corporate houses to show the extent of CG and CSR undertaken by them. The information is shown in the tabular form or in statement form, both are included for the purpose of the study.FindingsIn India, the CG practices are mandatory as per the clause 49 of the listing agreement of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for all the companies listed on recognized stock exchanges of India. However; there are two parts of disclosure – mandatory and non‐mandatory. In so far as mandatory requirements are concerned, 100 per cent compliance exists. But with regard to non‐mandatory requirements the results are quite disheartening. Similarly, when the study analyzed the annual reports to examine the extent of corporate responsibility disclosure the results are equally discouraging for reasons discuss below in the introduction part of the paper.Originality/valueThe study has revealed certain awakening facts, which will serve as a useful guide for policy formulation in relation to Indian corporate sector.

show abstract

Section: Corporate Governance In Indiamentioning

confidence: 99%