Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.5.1671-1678.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Patterns in the Selection of Viral Mutations among Patients Receiving Nucleoside and Nucleotide Drug Combinations Directed against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, transmission of resistance in the era of mono or dual therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) may have been predominantly due to thymidine analogue associated resistance mutations such as M41L and T215Y/F [5 ]. In contrast, following the introduction of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), there was a marked increase in the incidence of NNRTI-associated resistance observed in treatment of naïve patients [6 ].…”
Section: Levels Of Transmitted Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, transmission of resistance in the era of mono or dual therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) may have been predominantly due to thymidine analogue associated resistance mutations such as M41L and T215Y/F [5 ]. In contrast, following the introduction of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), there was a marked increase in the incidence of NNRTI-associated resistance observed in treatment of naïve patients [6 ].…”
Section: Levels Of Transmitted Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction between mutations selected by both drugs has been reported. Lowlevel resistance to AZT can be reversed with the emergence of the 184V mutation (Wainberg et al, 2005). This resensitization effect may explain why this dual NRTI backbone has been found to be both potent and slow in resistance development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In RT, a change at position 184 from methionine to valine results in an increase in FC for 3TC [11], [12] and FTC [13] while it decreases the FC for AZT, d4T and TDF [14]. This effect was observed with both types of backbone as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%