2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2009.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing effects of family background on transitions to secondary education in the Netherlands: Consequences of educational expansion and reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schimpl-Neimanns (2000) investigated social inequality and its trends in the transitions to different secondary tracks in Germany and found that inequality decreased in access to the lower tracks of secondary education, but that the academic track of secondary education (Gymnasium) remained exclusive. Tieben et al (2009) come to a similar conclusion for the Dutch educational system. Besides, these authors found that the growth in educational participation for cohorts that entered secondary education between 1946 and 1998 mainly took place in MAVO and HAVO and that access-selectivity decreased only in these tracks, while access to VWO remained exclusive.…”
Section: Trends In Inequalitysupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schimpl-Neimanns (2000) investigated social inequality and its trends in the transitions to different secondary tracks in Germany and found that inequality decreased in access to the lower tracks of secondary education, but that the academic track of secondary education (Gymnasium) remained exclusive. Tieben et al (2009) come to a similar conclusion for the Dutch educational system. Besides, these authors found that the growth in educational participation for cohorts that entered secondary education between 1946 and 1998 mainly took place in MAVO and HAVO and that access-selectivity decreased only in these tracks, while access to VWO remained exclusive.…”
Section: Trends In Inequalitysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, this research does not scrutinize on trends over time. There have been several attempts to scrutinize on the changes of social selectivity over time within tracked educational systems, but these merely focus on the secondary level and do not take subsequent decision patterns into account (Schimpl-Neimanns 2000; Tieben et al 2009;Tieben and Wolbers 2008). Schimpl-Neimanns (2000) investigated social inequality and its trends in the transitions to different secondary tracks in Germany and found that inequality decreased in access to the lower tracks of secondary education, but that the academic track of secondary education (Gymnasium) remained exclusive.…”
Section: Trends In Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Netherlands has an educational system with considerable between-school tracking at age 12; thus, the ultimate level of education reached is largely based on early scholastic developments and schooling decisions. Studies have shown quite strong effects of parental education on the type of secondary school chosen (Tieben et al 2010). Moreover, the role of ascription is relatively large in the Netherlands compared with other countries because of the early tracking system (Van de Werfhorst and Mijs 2010).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, participation increased especially in the intermediate secondary track (HAVO) and decreased in LBO. Inequality in the transition to secondary education has decreased over time (de Graaf and Ganzeboom 1993), but only for the lower and intermediate secondary tracks (Tieben, de Graaf, and de Graaf 2010). The reasons for this trend are not entirely clear but the authors refer to modernization and educational reforms as possible explanations.…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Breen and Jonsson, we therefore do not scrutinize the transition from secondary to post-secondary education, but focus on the secondary educational outcome instead. We know from previous research (de Graaf and Ganzeboom 1993;Tieben, de Graaf, and de Graaf 2010) that inequality in the Dutch educational system especially occurs at the first transition after primary school, when students are allocated to one of the four existing tracks of secondary education. Although this transition appears to be the most crucial in the educational career, it does not entirely determine secondary school outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%