1969
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(69)90105-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing colour preferences of chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Warm stimuli, in particular, are attractive: rat pups approach and huddle with a variety of animate and inanimate sources of heat (Alberts, 1978;Alberts & Brunjes, 1978;Brunjes & Alberts, 1979;Cosnier, 1965). Moreover, temperature cues have been shown to be effective reinforcers for associative learning in small, thermally fragile, infant organisms (Martin & Alberts, 1982;Taylor, Sluckin, & Hewitt, 1969). Perhaps the power of "maternal" stimuli, as they bear on the establishment of olfactory huddling preferences, derives from the thermal consequences of contact interaction.…”
Section: Experiments Iv: Thermotactile Stimulation From a Surrogate Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warm stimuli, in particular, are attractive: rat pups approach and huddle with a variety of animate and inanimate sources of heat (Alberts, 1978;Alberts & Brunjes, 1978;Brunjes & Alberts, 1979;Cosnier, 1965). Moreover, temperature cues have been shown to be effective reinforcers for associative learning in small, thermally fragile, infant organisms (Martin & Alberts, 1982;Taylor, Sluckin, & Hewitt, 1969). Perhaps the power of "maternal" stimuli, as they bear on the establishment of olfactory huddling preferences, derives from the thermal consequences of contact interaction.…”
Section: Experiments Iv: Thermotactile Stimulation From a Surrogate Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common to find in the imprinting literature that chicks or ducklings imprinted on stimulus A and then given a choice test between stimuli A and B show as a group a statistically significant preference for A, but that some birds show a preference for the novel stimulus B. To give one example; Taylor et al (1969) measured chicks' preference for a red or a blue plastic square before and after exposure to one of the objects. A significant majority of the red-exposed chicks shifted towards a preference for red, but five out of the sample of 29 showed a shift towards blue.…”
Section: The Context Of Recognition In the Imprinted Birdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The naive preference for red survives the exposure to green, and such preferences can be explained adaptively as means of minimizing the risk of imprinting on inappropriate things such as foliage. Even so, studies such as that of Taylor et al (1969) using designs balanced to account for naive preference still show a proportion of birds approaching the novel stimulus.…”
Section: The Context Of Recognition In the Imprinted Birdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the results of these two studies may be atcributed to strain differences in the chicks used, ' procedural differences, seasonal variations, or differences in the behavioral criteria used to measure the following response. Age and prior experience also affect the color preferences of young chicks (Taylor, et al, 1969;Gray, 1961).These earlier findings raise three questions: ( 1 ) Does the background color of the testing arena affect the stimulus object color preferences of young domestic chicks? ( 2 ) Does the color of che testing arena affect the following responses of the young chicks?…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The differences in the results of these two studies may be atcributed to strain differences in the chicks used, ' procedural differences, seasonal variations, or differences in the behavioral criteria used to measure the following response. Age and prior experience also affect the color preferences of young chicks (Taylor, et al, 1969;Gray, 1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%