2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.195407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing character of electronic transitions in graphene: From single-particle excitations to plasmons

Abstract: In this paper we clarify the nature of π and π + σ electron excitations in pristine graphene. We clearly demonstrate the continuous transition from single particle to collective character of such excitations and how screening modifies their dispersion relations. We prove that π and π + σ plasmons do exist in graphene, though occurring only for a particular range of wave vectors and with finite damping rate. Particular attention is paid to comparing the theoretical results with available EELS measurements in op… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two energy ranges are generally distinguished, with a π plasmon peak in the 6-8 eV range and a σ + π peak at about 25 eV for bulk h-BN and also for graphite [43][44][45][46][47], the position and intensity of the latter peak being strongly dependent on the number of sheets in thin samples. The position of some structures can also be associated with specific interband transitions, particularly if they are correlated with the behavior of ε(q,ω) itself through Kramers-Kronig analyses [43], but some controversy has appeared recently between these two interpretations concerning the nature of the observed signals in 2D systems such as graphene [48][49][50][51]. Actually, deriving well-defined dispersion relations and deciding between the two possibilities is not obvious.…”
Section: B Low-loss Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two energy ranges are generally distinguished, with a π plasmon peak in the 6-8 eV range and a σ + π peak at about 25 eV for bulk h-BN and also for graphite [43][44][45][46][47], the position and intensity of the latter peak being strongly dependent on the number of sheets in thin samples. The position of some structures can also be associated with specific interband transitions, particularly if they are correlated with the behavior of ε(q,ω) itself through Kramers-Kronig analyses [43], but some controversy has appeared recently between these two interpretations concerning the nature of the observed signals in 2D systems such as graphene [48][49][50][51]. Actually, deriving well-defined dispersion relations and deciding between the two possibilities is not obvious.…”
Section: B Low-loss Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The v GG terms have been proved to efficiently cut off the spurious interaction between replicas of planar graphenebased systems [18,[45][46][47]. Finally, the EL spectra were computed by…”
Section: Local Density Calculations and Geometry Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A serious drawback stems from the long-range character of the Coulomb potential, which allows nonnegligible interactions between repeated planar arrays even at large distances. To cut off this unwanted phenomenon, we replace v 0 GG by the truncated Fourier integral [18,19,[45][46][47] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35]). Thus the observed VHS EELS peak values can be rationalized by the contribution of the real part of the dielectric function to the loss function [32,36], effectively shifting VHS EELS peaks away from the corresponding optical values (given by maxima in the imaginary part of the dielectric function).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%