2018
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1739/aac72d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing cell mechanics—a precondition for malignant transformation of oral squamous carcinoma cells

Abstract: Oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are the 6 th most common cancer and the diagnosis is often belated for a curative treatment. The reliable and early differentiation between healthy and diseased cells is the main aim of this study in order to improve the quality of the treatment and to understand tumour pathogenesis.Here, the optical stretcher is used to analyse mechanical properties of cells and their potential to serve as a marker for malignancy. Stretching experiments revealed for the first time that cel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We not only found an increased cellular deformability in Rac1 −/− cell clones compared to Rac1 fl/fl cells, but Rac removal also caused severely decreased invasion. Our results thus contrast with several other studies reporting that the invasiveness of specific cancer cells is increased when the deformability is increased 47,50,62,63,74 . However, there are other studies that agree with our results, since they show increased deformability (decreased stiffness) and decreased invasiveness of distinct cancer cells and fibroblasts 43,56,57,69 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We not only found an increased cellular deformability in Rac1 −/− cell clones compared to Rac1 fl/fl cells, but Rac removal also caused severely decreased invasion. Our results thus contrast with several other studies reporting that the invasiveness of specific cancer cells is increased when the deformability is increased 47,50,62,63,74 . However, there are other studies that agree with our results, since they show increased deformability (decreased stiffness) and decreased invasiveness of distinct cancer cells and fibroblasts 43,56,57,69 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are other studies that agree with our results, since they show increased deformability (decreased stiffness) and decreased invasiveness of distinct cancer cells and fibroblasts 43,56,57,69 . It is worth asking whether these apparently contradictory findings may be explained by the use of distinct methodology, in particular since softness or stiffness of cancer cells has been determined with either optical cell stretcher (adhesion-independent) 47,62,63,74 , magnetic tweezer (adhesion-dependent) 43,56,57,73 or AFM (both adhesion-dependent and -independent) 50 . However, cancer cells frequently appeared to display increased invasiveness if they were softer, in a fashion independent of how softness was measured, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the "universal" hypothesis that individual cancer cells are generally softer than non-malignant cells is true (Guck et al, 2005;Cross et al, 2007;Remmerbach et al, 2009;Fritsch et al, 2010;Runge et al, 2014;Lekka, 2016;Meinhövel et al, 2018), MDA-MB-231 cancer cells should be softer than MCF-7 cancer cells, since the MDA-MB-231 cancer cells were more invasive compared to MCF-7 cells. But is the softness of every malignant cancer cell type independent of its biochemical or genetic phenotype fundamentally dependent on different cytoskeletal mechanics or on different nuclear mechanics or on both?…”
Section: Cytoskeletal and Nuclear Stiffness Of Adherent Human Breast mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these features contribute to the regulation of cellular motility in 3D confined extracellular matrices. There is still the general hypothesis that cancer cell mechanics contributes "universally" to the 3D migration, as cancer cells with an increased invasive capacity have displayed increased 3D motility and are more deformable and hence softer than cancer cells with a decreased invasive capacity (Guck et al, 2005;Cross et al, 2007;Remmerbach et al, 2009;Fritsch et al, 2010;Runge et al, 2014;Lekka, 2016;Meinhövel et al, 2018). In contrast, it has been hypothesized that a "universal" mechanism for all cancer cell types (Jonietz, 2012;Alibert et al, 2017) or even all cell types (Mierke, 2019b) is probably not suitable for migration into 3D extracellular matrix confinements due to the multiple biochemical and genetic differences among the vastly different cell types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%