2014
DOI: 10.1080/15283488.2013.858225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing Behavior and Changing Personal Identity: The Case of Pregnant and Parenting Young Women and Antisocial Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption of one approach over the other is often justified based on the accuracy or efficiency of the model in estimating parameters because the choice involves a bias-variance tradeoff. 12 The Hausman [28] test is often employed to compare the parameter estimates from both models and assess the extent to which bias is introduced by ignoring the correlation between x itj and α i . If we can assume that α i is uncorrelated with one or more of the x itj in all time periods (i.e., α i is composed entirely of stochastic noise), random effects models are preferred due to its generalizability, flexibility, and efficiency in estimating within-and between-effects as well as cross-level interactions [32,70].…”
Section: Fixed Effects Versus Random Effects Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of one approach over the other is often justified based on the accuracy or efficiency of the model in estimating parameters because the choice involves a bias-variance tradeoff. 12 The Hausman [28] test is often employed to compare the parameter estimates from both models and assess the extent to which bias is introduced by ignoring the correlation between x itj and α i . If we can assume that α i is uncorrelated with one or more of the x itj in all time periods (i.e., α i is composed entirely of stochastic noise), random effects models are preferred due to its generalizability, flexibility, and efficiency in estimating within-and between-effects as well as cross-level interactions [32,70].…”
Section: Fixed Effects Versus Random Effects Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is as we would expect given research on narrative processing, which suggests that self-reflection and drawing meaning from one's experiences are processes by which narrative identity is constructed (e.g., Breen, 2014;Habermas & Bluck, 2000;McLean, 2015;2009;McLean, Breen, & Fournier;McLean, Pasupathi, & Pals, 2007). Situations in which one discovers a gap between the self as expected and the self as expressed are the kinds of experiences that create a demand for narrative processing (Breen, 2014;Bruner, 1990;Chandler et al, 2003) as one is compelled to create explanatory narratives that bridge the gaps to create a coherent whole.…”
Section: Self-reflectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The process of developing identity requires us to make meaning of our experiences and to string them together in ways that create a coherent sense of self (Chandler, Lalonde, Sokol, & Hallett, 2003;Habermas & deSilviera, 2008). Identity development is a continuous process of creation; new experiences lead to new interpretations of the past and, at the same time, the emergence of new goals, relationship, and commitments in the present prompt us to create new stories about who we want to become (e.g., Breen, 2014;Ricoeur, 1992). From a narrative perspective on identity, the stories we tell about ourselves reveal the state and contents of our current self-identity while also being constitutive in the ongoing construction of identity; in other words, they are both a portrait of the self in the present moment and a tool for constructing the self that one is becoming (e.g., Fivush, Reese, & Haden, 2006;McLean, 2015;Ricoeur, 1992).…”
Section: Identity Development: a Narrative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one woman indicated that she had constructed a prosocial positive self and a roadmap to get to a place where she would not have to deliver her child while in prison: "… now I realized I have to finish my schooling, I have to get a job." Breen [20] also reported that these desisting women in her sample changed their preferences as well as their identities and adopted more prosocial values. Similar research was conducted by Sharpe [109], who interviewed 19 mothers, each with nontrivial offending histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breen [20] conducted a mixed-methods study of 27 pregnant and parenting women with extensive criminal records and reported results consistent with ITD. First, many of the women initiated desistance when they became dissatisfied with their life of crime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%