Changing balances in Dutch higher education

Abstract

Abstract. Like many other higher education systems in the Western world, Dutch higher education underwent profound changes during the last decade. In this article we will present an overview of these changes, and try to formulate an analytical framework that might be suited to analyze this process. In order to set the stage, we will begin with an overview of the Dutch higher education system, in which the broad structure is described, and some trends are presented. Next, an overview is given of the retrenchment and restructuring operations with which Dutch higher education was confronted during the last decade. Drawing, mainly, on public administration and political theory, we then attempt to formulate a framework for analysis. In this we focus on the Dutch higher education system as a policy network, and address the relationships that exist between the various key actors in the network: between government and higher education, among higher education institutions themselves, and among the different actors within the institutions, especially administrators and academics. In doing so, we hope to demonstrate that at all these levels some identical basic processes operate which to a large extent determine the outcomes of governmental policies aimed at changing the higher education system. (Clark 1983:137) Time and again the modern state stumbles over the academic system Higher education in the NetherlandsThe Dutch higher education system: structure and trends Within the Dutch higher education system three types of institutions can be discerned: universities, institutes for higher vocational education (HBO), and the Open University. In the Netherlands, with around 15 million people, there are 13 universities, 86 HBO-institutions, all located throughout the country, and an Open University (distance education) in the south of the Netherlands, with 18 regional study centres dispersed throughout the country. As the Open University, because of its special nature, was not involved in the higher education policies which are considered in this article, no further attention shall be paid to it.All higher education institutions in the Netherlands are funded largely by government, the additional resources coming from teaching, research and services such as consultancy, performed for third parties. All institutions operate within the legal and funding framework set up by government. To further clarify the operation of the Dutch higher education system, some more detailed comments can be made regarding funding and student enrolment. 496 FundingWithin Dutch higher education, three 'flows of funds' are discerned. The first flow of funds is the direct funding of institutions through government. Most of the governmental funding through this flow is based on normative models for universities and for HBO-institutions, the main difference being that the HBOmodel does not contain a research component, as fundamental research is not considered a task for these vocationally oriented institutions. The principles underlying both models c...

Government Continues to Do Its Job. A Comparative Study of Governance Shifts in the Higher Education Sector

“…The 1970 reform of higher education, following a common trend in Continental Europe resulting from the pressure of massification, focused on the questions of democratization and functional representation, and the period from 1970 to the mid‐1990s saw institutional governance based on the traditional corporative‐democratic system (distributive and consensual internal policy‐making). Such institutional characteristics, however, were clearly ineffective since the Dutch government (the forerunner in Continental Europe) decided to modify its position on the steering of the higher education system during the early 1980s (Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen 1985), when it adopted a policy designed to gradually replace the previous centralized arrangement with an autonomistic policy designed to grant universities increased decisional leeway (Goedegebuure and Westerheijden 1991; Van Vught 1991). Basically, what happened in The Netherlands was that the government's commitment to improving the performance of the higher education system, by granting universities a greater degree of independence together with financial incentives, was met by opposition from the country's universities Institutional autonomy was too demanding for universities that were used to the traditional consensual approach to internal governance.…”

Governance Reforms and Organizational Dilemmas in European Universities

“…Systemic governance was centralized and bureaucratic, in keeping with the traditional Continental model. In the mid-1980s, the Dutch government launched a policy designed to give universities wider decisional powers with regard to their own affairs (Goedegebuure and Westerheijden 1991). However, the results of this reform proved unsatisfactory, since the consensual policy style did not fit the need for institutional autonomy and accountability.…”

Shaping European universities

“…This document was the first governmental declaration that the traditional strategy of command and control, which had characterised higher education for the previous century, had to be abandoned in favour of a steering-at-a-distance strategy. Autonomy and quality assessment were ideas/policy tools launched by that document and formalised by law in 1992 (Goedegebuure & Westerheijden, 1991).…”