1999
DOI: 10.4057/jsr.50.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of the Determinant of Class Identification in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible to recognize that class lines in Japanese society are drawn according to occupation and the equivalent status publicly associated with certain occupations. This is supported by Kikkawa (1999), who notes that while middle class identification still remains at 75% the criteria have changed to include occupation, education, income, and life satisfaction as significant determinants.…”
Section: A Common Predicamentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, it is possible to recognize that class lines in Japanese society are drawn according to occupation and the equivalent status publicly associated with certain occupations. This is supported by Kikkawa (1999), who notes that while middle class identification still remains at 75% the criteria have changed to include occupation, education, income, and life satisfaction as significant determinants.…”
Section: A Common Predicamentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The reason why this paper adopts personal income, contrary to previous studies adopting household income instead of personal income (e.g. Kikkawa, 1999), is that our analysis is restricted to male samples, whose class identifications are more oriented to person-level status than to household-level status (Seiyama, 1998) 3 Preceding Misumi (1986, Hodge and Treiman (1968), and Jackman and Jackman (1973),…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That is, people almost consistently tend to compare their income to that of others who earn less than them with a distorted perception of the income difference. In the studies of class identification, it is relatively rare to address the stability of the mechanism to determine class identification compared to its temporal fluctuations (e.g., Kikkawa, ). As far as the distributive stability of class identification is concerned, our implication seems important because it indicates that temporal stability is an underlying factor in the determination process of class identification.…”
Section: Empirical Investigation On the Validity Of Income Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations