1982
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(82)90204-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of lead and barium with time in California off-shore basin sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those estimated baseline values of 22–25 μg/g in sedimentary material are higher than measurements of preindustrial lead levels in California’s coastal sediments: north, south, east, and within our study area. These include baseline lead levels of: 5–8 μg/g in San Francisco Bay, ,, 10 μg/g in the Sierra Mountains, ≤ 10 μg/g in Monterey Bay, and 6–8 μg/g in Southern California’s coastal marine basins . Consequently, we consider the lead concentrations of the commercial “soils” (1.6–2.3 μg/g) and “sands” (3.8–4.7 μg/g) used in our study comparable to natural levels, those of lead concentrations in Santa Cruz soils (15–45 μg/g) elevated above natural levels, and those in the Preserve (110 μg/g) grossly contaminatedby an order of magnitude or more, which is consistent with our previous report .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those estimated baseline values of 22–25 μg/g in sedimentary material are higher than measurements of preindustrial lead levels in California’s coastal sediments: north, south, east, and within our study area. These include baseline lead levels of: 5–8 μg/g in San Francisco Bay, ,, 10 μg/g in the Sierra Mountains, ≤ 10 μg/g in Monterey Bay, and 6–8 μg/g in Southern California’s coastal marine basins . Consequently, we consider the lead concentrations of the commercial “soils” (1.6–2.3 μg/g) and “sands” (3.8–4.7 μg/g) used in our study comparable to natural levels, those of lead concentrations in Santa Cruz soils (15–45 μg/g) elevated above natural levels, and those in the Preserve (110 μg/g) grossly contaminatedby an order of magnitude or more, which is consistent with our previous report .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include baseline lead levels of: 5−8 μg/g in San Francisco Bay, 27,43,44 10 μg/g in the Sierra Mountains, 45 ≤ 10 μg/g in Monterey Bay, 20 and 6−8 μg/g in Southern California's coastal marine basins. 46 Consequently, we consider the lead concentrations of the commercial "soils" (1.6−2.3 μg/g) and "sands" (3.8−4.7 μg/g) used in our study comparable to natural levels, those of lead concentrations in Santa Cruz soils (15−45 μg/g) elevated above natural levels, and those in the Preserve (110 μg/g) grossly contaminatedby an order of magnitude or more, which is consistent with our previous report. 19 That variability, as well as the similarity between lead isotopic compositions of sediments in the Preserve and those of historic emissions of industrial lead from leaded gasoline combustion in California as shown in our previous report on lead contamination in the Preserve (Flegal et al) 19 supports that assumption.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%