1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1992.tb00176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of inversion polymorphism in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Thirty eight laboratory populations (20 mass cultures and 18 isofemale lines) of Drosophila melanogaster were established from population samples of 20 geographic localities (12 north and 8 south) in India. Each population was kept for 20 generations in the laboratory by transferring 50 flies to fresh culture bottles in every generation after which chromosomal analysis of 100 or more larvae was made. In mass cultures, a decline in the frequency of all the polymorphic inversions detected in natural populations,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D. melanogaster populations from Northern and Southern Japan were found to differ with respect to the In(3R)P inversions , in that southern populations possess higher number of inversions than the northern ones (see Figure 2). Similar trend of In(3R)P inversions was found along latitudinal gradients along the eastern coast of Australia, North America (Knibb 1982) as well as in Asian populations (Singh and Das 1992) of D. melanogaster. Chromosomal inversion studies hint that inversions also play a central role in evolutionary processes (through local adaptation) (Kirkpatrick and Barton 2006).…”
Section: Genetic and Genomic Basis Of Clinal Variationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…D. melanogaster populations from Northern and Southern Japan were found to differ with respect to the In(3R)P inversions , in that southern populations possess higher number of inversions than the northern ones (see Figure 2). Similar trend of In(3R)P inversions was found along latitudinal gradients along the eastern coast of Australia, North America (Knibb 1982) as well as in Asian populations (Singh and Das 1992) of D. melanogaster. Chromosomal inversion studies hint that inversions also play a central role in evolutionary processes (through local adaptation) (Kirkpatrick and Barton 2006).…”
Section: Genetic and Genomic Basis Of Clinal Variationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A potential confounding effect in this comparison is that the inversion was sampled in 1979 in isofemale lines that had been maintained in the laboratory for up to nine generations, whereas in the current study field‐caught females were genotyped. Laboratory culture might result in a decrease in inversion frequency in mass‐bred populations but this is likely to be small (Singh & Das 1992) and we have not found any systematic shift in the frequency of In(3R)Payne arrangements in any of our laboratory populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Four inversions of D. melanogaster that are cosmopolitan, In(2L)t, In(2R)NS, In(3L)Payne and In(3R)Payne, show clines in North America where inverted sequences become more common in warmer lower latitudes (Mettler et al 1977). They also show clines in eastern Australia as established by Knibb et al (1981) and on other continents Singh and Das 1992). Knibb et al (1981) scored inversion frequencies cytologically in isofemale lines sampled from 19 Australasian populations (5-76 lines per population) in a region extending from New Guinea to Tasmania.…”
Section: Clines In Inversions and Their Impact On Genetic Disequilibrmentioning
confidence: 98%