2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl092011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of Event Size Distribution During Episodes of Shallow Tectonic Tremor, Nankai Trough

Abstract: Slow earthquakes follow a power‐law size distribution with an exponential taper for the largest events. We investigated changes in the size distribution of shallow tectonic tremor events during two prolonged tremor episodes (>1 month) along the Nankai trough and found that the slope of the size distributions increased while the cut‐off magnitudes decreased late during each episode, as tremor activity waned. Interpreting these changes with the two‐dimensional probabilistic cell automaton model of slow earthquak… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Tremor swarms, on the other hand, behave with an earthquake‐like frequency magnitude distribution with b values near 1. This is in agreement numerous studies from Japan (e.g., Nakano & Yabe, 2021), the San Andreas Fault (e.g., Staudenmaier et al., 2019), and Cascadia (e.g., Bostock et al., 2015; Wech et al., 2010) that have shown various slow earthquake phenomena to follow a power‐law size distribution. An exponential taper does fit the swarm data slightly better as well, but only at the very upper end of the distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(b) Tremor swarms, on the other hand, behave with an earthquake‐like frequency magnitude distribution with b values near 1. This is in agreement numerous studies from Japan (e.g., Nakano & Yabe, 2021), the San Andreas Fault (e.g., Staudenmaier et al., 2019), and Cascadia (e.g., Bostock et al., 2015; Wech et al., 2010) that have shown various slow earthquake phenomena to follow a power‐law size distribution. An exponential taper does fit the swarm data slightly better as well, but only at the very upper end of the distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%