2016
DOI: 10.17221/96/2015-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes of agricultural land characteristics as a result of afforestation using introduced tree species

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The paper documents the mid-term changes of the soil characteristics and upper soil dynamics in the stands of introduced tree species, grand fir and Douglas-fir, on the former agricultural lands. These species were compared with Norway spruce stand and original grassland in the same site conditions at the Hrubá Skála locality (Eastern Bohemia). The plot was established in 1980 on Luvisol type of soil, sandy clay. Altitude ranges between 350 and 360 m a.s.l., mean annual temperature was 7.8°C, mean ann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good growth of this species was confirmed also on abandoned agricultural lands, but protection against browsing is necessary in this case (Tužinský et al 2015). These areas are relatively large throughout Europe, including the Czech Republic (Vopravil et al 2015) and therefore the introduced species can play important role in this process (Podrázský et al 2015(Podrázský et al , 2016. The evaluation of their effects on the soil ecosystem compartment can prevent many mistakes (Ehrenfeld 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Good growth of this species was confirmed also on abandoned agricultural lands, but protection against browsing is necessary in this case (Tužinský et al 2015). These areas are relatively large throughout Europe, including the Czech Republic (Vopravil et al 2015) and therefore the introduced species can play important role in this process (Podrázský et al 2015(Podrázský et al , 2016. The evaluation of their effects on the soil ecosystem compartment can prevent many mistakes (Ehrenfeld 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The supply of Norway spruce timber will likely decrease in the near future [10]. Afforestation of agricultural lands constitutes a serious change in soil dynamics, including soil structure, organic matter and nutrient dynamics [11][12][13][14]. Compared to Norway spruce, Douglas fir shows less negative effects on the forest soil [15,16] and herb vegetation layer [17], and thus Douglas fir can represent a very convenient substitute for declining spruce, at least as a part of its non-native range in commercial forests [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of Douglas-fir was more similar to the effects of grand fir, and was less favourable compared to broad-leaved stands, but significantly more favourable compared to Norway spruce. But it seems that effects of grand fir are more favourable comparing to Douglas-fir, which was documented also at other sites (Podrázský et al 2016a).…”
Section: Douglas-fir Effect On Soilmentioning
confidence: 68%