Changes in Weight-Related Outcomes Among Adolescents Following Consumer Price Increases of Taxed Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Following the implementation of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in Mexico in 2014, SSB prices increased by about 10% on average, but differently across cities. It remains unclear how observed SSB price changes are associated with adolescent weight-related outcomes.OBJECTIVE To compare weight-related outcomes among adolescents living in cities with differential SSB price changes before and after the SSB tax was implemented in Mexico. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Associations between differential SSB price changes and changes in weight-related outcomes were examined overall and by sex among 12 654 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years born between 1999 and 2002 living in 39 cities in Mexico. Multivariate regressions with individual fixed effects were applied on longitudinal individual-level yearly clinical data (height and weight) from 2012 to 2017 collected by the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) and merged with city-level SSB price data from 2011 to 2016 collected by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). Data were analyzed from July 2018 to July 2021. EXPOSURES Yearly city-level changes in SSB prices between 2011 and 2016.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Age-and sex-specific body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) percentile and indicator for overweight or obesity if BMI was at or above the 85th percentile.RESULTS Before 2014, 46% of 12 654 adolescents (6850 girls and 5804 boys) included in this study had obesity or overweight. The mean (SD) age was 11.38 (1.08) years. Among girls, a 10% SSB price increase was associated with a 1.3 percentage point absolute decrease (95% CI, −2.19 to −0.36; P = .008) or a 3% relative decrease in overweight or obesity prevalence within 2 years of a price change. For girls with BMI at or above the 75th percentile pretax, this price increase was associated with a 0.59 lower BMI percentile (95% CI, −1.08 to −0.10; P = .02) or a 0.67% relative decrease. Improved outcomes for girls were observed in cities where price increases were greater than 10% after the tax. No such associations were observed for boys. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, increased SSB prices were associated with decreased overweight or obesity prevalence among girls but not among boys. Improvements in outcomes were small, and mostly observed for girls with heavier weight and in cities where price increases after the tax were greater than 10%.

Associations between trajectories of obesity prevalence in English primary school children and the UK soft drink industry levy: an interrupted time series analysis of surveillance data

“…While our findings on gender differences in obesity prevalence changes in relation to sugar taxes on SSBs are consistent with previous studies[29], it is unclear why the UK SDIL might affect obesity prevalence in girls and boys differently, especially since boys are higher consumers of SSBs[7]. One explanation is that there were factors (e.g.…”

Daily Fluid Intake Behaviors and Associated Health Effects Among Australian and United States Populations

“…Outside of media and social constructs, environmental changes to University dining halls that promote healthy beverage intake by coloring coding choices and advertising healthier options have been successful in increasing water uptake while lowering SSB (Di Sebastiano et al, 2021 ). Taxation on SSB's in some countries has substantially driven down the use of SSB though the improvements on body composition may be small (Gracner et al, 2022 ) with the percentage of taxation, country, socioeconomic status, age, and sex being constructs that affect the effectiveness of SSB taxation (Acton et al, 2021 ).…”

Fructose Intake, Hypertension and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Aspects. A Narrative Review

“…A Mexican study assessed whether increasing the price of SSBs was associated with adolescent weight-related outcomes after implementation of the SSB tax. Increased prices were associated with decreased prevalence of excess weight among girls only, mostly in those with higher BMI, and where the price increment due to the tax was greater than 10% ( 190 ). The fact that a higher tax may be more effective has also been suggested by a qualitative study performed in a Detroit suburban middle school that gathered information on how a 20% tax on SSBs would affect adolescent SSB consumption.…”