2006
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000219836.54861.cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Utilization of Spinal Fusionin the United States

Abstract: Cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spinal fusion have experienced a rapid increase in utilization in isolation and compared with other surgical procedures in contemporary practice. These changes are most pronounced for patients over 40 years of age, and degenerative disc disease seems to account for much of this increase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because hospital reimbursement is often based on a diagnosis-related group fee schedule, it is possible coding could be selected in a manner such that the maximally reimbursed code is listed as the primary diagnosis for admission. Although such potential for variability can typically be equalized by the volume of patients included in the NIS, we followed precedent to include only encounters in which VCF was listed as the primary admission diagnosis [10,15,26]. Second, any research using the NIS database cannot assess traditionally supported and validated outcome measures such as 30-day and 1-year mortality, pain scores, and outcome questionnaires (SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, and others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because hospital reimbursement is often based on a diagnosis-related group fee schedule, it is possible coding could be selected in a manner such that the maximally reimbursed code is listed as the primary diagnosis for admission. Although such potential for variability can typically be equalized by the volume of patients included in the NIS, we followed precedent to include only encounters in which VCF was listed as the primary admission diagnosis [10,15,26]. Second, any research using the NIS database cannot assess traditionally supported and validated outcome measures such as 30-day and 1-year mortality, pain scores, and outcome questionnaires (SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index, and others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database has been used to evaluate use trends and outcomes for a variety of procedures in spine surgery [1,5,10,15,20,26,28,33,36,47,52,59] as well as the impact of comorbidities on the outcome of spine procedures [3,11,17,18]. Such a database allows a larger patient sample to be amassed in relatively short period of time and for a lower cost than could be achieved by even a large multicenter trial; they also can offer insight into the actual use, complications, and outcomes of a procedure in ''real life'' and without the restrictive criteria imposed for inclusion in controlled trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the aging population will increase the utilization of lumbar spine fusion surgeries [6]. This trend is likely to increase the absolute number of deaths associated with this surgery, even if overall mortality rates remain unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other indications include trauma and neoplastic disease. In the time period between 1988 and 2001, the number of spine fusions in the United States increased from some 24 000 to more than 120 000 procedures per year [9,10] ; degenerative disc disease as a primary diagnosis was present in almost two thirds of cases (65.3%) by 2001 [11] . Taking a closer look at the available data, the rate of surgery increased by approximately 100% during the 1980s and more than 220% during the 1990s.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 1996, when intervertebral fusion cages received approval by the food and drug administration, an exponential increase in case burden was seen. In 2001, depending on age group, as many as 60 to 90 per 100 000 patients underwent cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine fusion [11] . The most dramatic rise was evident in the group of patients aged 60 or older in all procedures except cervical spinal fusion, which peaked in the group aged 40 to 59 years [9] .…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%