2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in total carbon and nutrients in soil profiles and accumulation in biomass after a 30-year rotation of Pinus radiata on podzolized sands: Impacts of intensive harvesting on soil resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the results of Rossi et al (2009), Qing-Biao et al (2009 and Hopmans and Elms (2009), who concluded that with increasing soil depth, bulk density and pH increased, while the amount of N %, organic matter and OC decreased. Previous studies also have revealed that there is an inverse relationship between soil carbon sequestration and soil depth in arid and semi-arid regions (Rice 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are in agreement with the results of Rossi et al (2009), Qing-Biao et al (2009 and Hopmans and Elms (2009), who concluded that with increasing soil depth, bulk density and pH increased, while the amount of N %, organic matter and OC decreased. Previous studies also have revealed that there is an inverse relationship between soil carbon sequestration and soil depth in arid and semi-arid regions (Rice 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Based on these observations, some studies examined the effects of forest thinning on soil CO 2 efflux with equivocal results ranging from positive effect on soil carbon release [14], negative effect [5,15] and no effect [16][17][18]. Others reported that intensive biomass harvesting may negatively impact carbon stocks in forest soil and vegetation [11], forest thinning did not have a significant impact on carbon stocks or fluxes [19], and remaining residues after harvesting increased carbon storage [20]. Unfortunately, few studies have examined the concurrent effects of two or more factors simultaneously, e.g., thinning and residual removal (branches, needle/leaf and twigs removed with thinning) on the forest net ecosystem productivity (NEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-fire exports of nutrients in stream water were significantly less than nutrient removals in burnt and harvested tree biomass of radiata pine. For example, exports of K, Ca and Mg of 8.4, 9.1 and 14.0 kg ha À1 over 3 years in stream water compare with total removals in tree biomass estimated at 207, 235 and 127 kg ha À1 for the 27 year-old radiata pine plantation at Clem (Hopmans and Elms, 2009). …”
Section: Solutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standing volume based on a pre-harvest assessment of the 27 year-old radiata pine stand was estimated at 358 m 3 ha À1 and the P content of the above-ground tree biomass was estimated at 28 kg ha À1 based on biomass data for 30 year-old radiata pine (Hopmans and Elms, 2009) and adjusted for the difference in stand volume. It is reasonable to assume that most of the tree crowns (foliage and smaller branches) were combusted and lost in convection currents during the wildfire and this was followed by total removal of burnt trees at salvage harvesting within 3 months after the fire.…”
Section: Phosphorusmentioning
confidence: 99%