1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02369978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the water-permeability of roots of some trees during drought stress and recovery, as related to problems of growth in urban environment

Abstract: SummaryIn relation to problems encountered in the urban environment a study was made of changes in the root's permeability to water of a number of tree species during a drought period, and of water conductivity during recovery. The results suggest than an important reduction of water conductivity occurs as soon as internal water stress builds up. Recovery appears to proceed irregularly. There appear to be differences in response -both as regards extent and speed -among different species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban trees are frequently stressed due to lack of water and nutrients [24], [25]. In some cases, stress can reduce tree defenses, leading to higher herbivore abundance [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban trees are frequently stressed due to lack of water and nutrients [24], [25]. In some cases, stress can reduce tree defenses, leading to higher herbivore abundance [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific root area (root surface area per unit dry weight) can be ten times higher than the specific leaf area (being 0.2 and 0.02 m 2 g -1 , respectively). For oak and aspen saplings grown in pots, (Wiersum and Harmanny, 1983) observed a root surface area of approximately twice the leaf surface area.…”
Section: Insert Figure 81 Near Herementioning
confidence: 96%
“…). Wiersum & Harmanny () showed that ash was relatively slow to reduce the permeability of its roots in response to drought. This is despite ash roots having a small mean vessel diameter (35.0 ± 1.1 μm, SD) compared to beech (42.3 ± 1.4 μm) in roots <3.5 mm diameter.…”
Section: Structure and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%