2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the soil hydrophobicity and structure of humic substances in sandy soil taken out of cultivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased hydrophobicity strongly limits the leachability of organic matter, and thus positively influences soil organic carbon sequestration in the soil. Hydrophobicity indicates an affinity of the soil matter to the water particles, and thus, has an impact on soil wetting and retention of water, and consists of an important feature for the evaluation of SOC quality [23]. For soil S1, we have not observed a clear tendency for hydrophobicity with the age of remediation (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased hydrophobicity strongly limits the leachability of organic matter, and thus positively influences soil organic carbon sequestration in the soil. Hydrophobicity indicates an affinity of the soil matter to the water particles, and thus, has an impact on soil wetting and retention of water, and consists of an important feature for the evaluation of SOC quality [23]. For soil S1, we have not observed a clear tendency for hydrophobicity with the age of remediation (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The ratio of hydrophobic C and hydrophilic C indicates hydrophobicity of the soil and consists of a sum of unoxidized atoms of carbon [20]. This ratio is considered to be an important indicator of SOM quality [23]. The value of hydrophobicity of the SOM results from the presence of aliphatic C-H founded in methyl, methylene, and methine groups [38].…”
Section: The Influence Of the Remediation Post-mining Soils On The Stability Of Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 B), although the OC contents and pH of the vineyard soil, and both the river and wetland sediments (Rouffach and Alteckendorf) were similar ( Table 1 ). The fraction of non-extractable residues (NER) may increase with lower water content due to the more hydrophobic nature of soil organic matter controlling pesticide extraction [22] . Therefore, together with changes in soil texture and structure, pH, soil OC content and the initial soil water content appear as fundamental parameters controlling pesticide aging in soil [23] and thus extraction from soil and sediment samples.…”
Section: Extraction From Soil and Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has significant repercussions on plant growth (Doerr et al, 2000), reduces evaporation (Rye and Smettem, 2017), retards infiltration, thereby enhancing overland flow/surface runoff and erosion (Ebel, 2020;Müller et al, 2018). SWR characteristics are influenced by soil water content (Leelamanie and Nishiwaki, 2019), soil water retention (Czachor et al, 2020), soil texture (Benito et al, 2019), soil pH (Diehl et al, 2010), SOC content and structure of humic substances (Mielnik et al, 2021), and clay (mainly kaolinite) content (Lichner et al, 2006). SWR is temporally and spatially variable (Täumer et at., 2006) and varies with depth (Sepehrnia et al, 2017;Turski et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%