2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-38584/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the quality of cause-of-death statistics in Brazil: garbage codes among registered deaths in 1996-2016

Abstract: Background: Registered causes in vital statistics classified as garbage codes (GC) are considered indicators of quality of cause-of-death data. Our aim was to describe temporal changes in this quality in Brazil, and the leading GCs according to levels assembled for the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. We also assessed socioeconomic differences in the burden of different levels of GCs at a regional level. Methods: We extracted data from the Brazilian Mortality Information System from 1996 to 2016. All thr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data reported were mapped to a list of underlying causes in the GBD causes of a hierarchy of death 13 . Uninformative causes of death codes (the "garbage codes") are redistributed among appropriate underlying causes of death 14 . The population-based cancer records (RCBP, in Portuguese) were the sources used to calculate the incidence estimates 15 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data reported were mapped to a list of underlying causes in the GBD causes of a hierarchy of death 13 . Uninformative causes of death codes (the "garbage codes") are redistributed among appropriate underlying causes of death 14 . The population-based cancer records (RCBP, in Portuguese) were the sources used to calculate the incidence estimates 15 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the ICD change from version 9 to 10, in 1996, may have led to different results concerning the classification of the underlying cause of death, but this change is not expected to modify the trends described herein, as we have conducted an analysis that included the last 30 years. There was an improvement in data quality over the period: the completeness of death counts increased from 80%, in 1980-1991, to 95%, in 2000-2010 50 , but a large regional variation still persists in a pattern similar to the distribution of ill-defined causes of death 14 . A quality factor is that mouth and lip cancers are considered as a group, even though they have distinct risk factors and characteristics, which might have influenced the estimates shown in this study, especially in relation to incidence.…”
Section: /9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies [22][23][24] show that in low-income locations access to diagnostic and therapeutic support services is lower, which can generate a higher number of recorded deaths from unclear causes, underestimating PCSC mortality. Therefore, the method developed by Cavalini and Ponce de Leon 25 was used to correct both under-reporting and unclear causes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in countries such as Scotland where publicly funded healthcare data in theory enumerates the whole population, in practice coverage is only 98% [49] and among this population some additional care will be provided privately. Additionally, the 100MCohort is a considerable investment, and is built on decades of work to improve statistics in Brazil [50]. Thus, in some countries much work may be required to create the necessary data infrastructure for similar cohorts to be created.…”
Section: Under Ascertainment Of Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%