2003
DOI: 10.1021/pr034038x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Protein Expression of Yeast as a Function of Carbon Source

Abstract: Protein expression trends in yeast were monitored as a function of carbon source (glucose versus galactose) using multidimensional high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to gas-phase fractionation, using relative intensity triggering (GPFri). Size exclusion HPLC was used to separate whole cell lysates, and following proteolysis of these fractions, each was separated by reversed phase HPLC, which was coupled on-line via electrospray to an ion trap mass spectrometer. The GPFri technique increased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
159
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptide identification was performed using SEQUEST Version 2.7 (ThermoQuest) (Eng et al 1994;Yates et al 1995) to search the D. vulgaris protein sequence database (Heidelberg et al 2004). The relative protein abundance was estimated on the basis of the number of peptide hits (Gao et al 2003;Qian et al 2005). The peptide hits for a given protein were the average of three LC-MS/MS measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide identification was performed using SEQUEST Version 2.7 (ThermoQuest) (Eng et al 1994;Yates et al 1995) to search the D. vulgaris protein sequence database (Heidelberg et al 2004). The relative protein abundance was estimated on the basis of the number of peptide hits (Gao et al 2003;Qian et al 2005). The peptide hits for a given protein were the average of three LC-MS/MS measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 In another study of protein expression changes in yeast as a function of carbon source, Opiteck and co-workers proposed a protein to be differentially expressed when the fold change in peptide hits was equal to or greater than 1.1 and the P value from a Student's t-test was equal to or less than 0.05. 33 In the present work, we have utilized a strict set of criteria that are designed to focus our attention to those proteins that have been identified by a large number of peptide hits and also appear to vary substantially in abundance (between the PD-model and control animals). The criteria used for selection are as follows.…”
Section: Semi-quantitation From the Peptide Hits Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an effective system was developed for measuring protein abundance change in P. gingivalis without the use of stable isotopes. A paper describing these quantitative methods based on spectral counting [19,20] and signal intensity measurements in MS 1 has been published [12]. We report our data here based on both types of calculation because it is not clear at present that either approach is better under all conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%