2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01416.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the phenology of the ground beetle Pterostichus madidus (Fabricius, 1775)

Abstract: A growing body of evidence shows that climate change can alter the phenology of plants and animals. In this study long‐term data from the UK Environmental Change Network (ECN) were analyzed to investigate whether there has been a change in the phenology of the ground beetle Pterostichus madidus (Fabricius, 1775). Pitfall trap data were available from 12 ECN sites across the United Kingdom, most of which have been in operation for more than 15 years. Weather and vegetation datasets were also utilized. Pitfall t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In nature, most thermal regimes fluctuate, and such fluctuations can have unexpected consequences, depending on whether the fluctuations lead to cold mortality or energy savings at low temperatures, and energy drain or damage repair at higher temperatures (Colinet et al , ). Thus, warmer winters could increase survival by reducing chilling injury (Bale & Hayward, ) or allowing earlier spring emergence (van Asch et al , ; Hahn & Denlinger, ; Pozsgai & Littlewood, ), although they could decrease survival by reducing insulating snow cover (Lawrence & Slater, ), leading to exposure to lethal air temperatures (Joshi et al , ; Bale & Hayward, ) or increased rates of energy use that deplete energy reserves (Bosch & Kemp, ; Irwin & Lee, ; Williams et al , ; Hahn & Denlinger, , ). The relative importance of each of these scenarios remains to be determined and is likely to be both region and species specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nature, most thermal regimes fluctuate, and such fluctuations can have unexpected consequences, depending on whether the fluctuations lead to cold mortality or energy savings at low temperatures, and energy drain or damage repair at higher temperatures (Colinet et al , ). Thus, warmer winters could increase survival by reducing chilling injury (Bale & Hayward, ) or allowing earlier spring emergence (van Asch et al , ; Hahn & Denlinger, ; Pozsgai & Littlewood, ), although they could decrease survival by reducing insulating snow cover (Lawrence & Slater, ), leading to exposure to lethal air temperatures (Joshi et al , ; Bale & Hayward, ) or increased rates of energy use that deplete energy reserves (Bosch & Kemp, ; Irwin & Lee, ; Williams et al , ; Hahn & Denlinger, , ). The relative importance of each of these scenarios remains to be determined and is likely to be both region and species specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of detrimental effects of climate change is also growing. For example, changing phenologies of some ground beetle species have been linked with climate change (Pozsgai & Littlewood, 2011, 2014; Pozsgai et al ., 2018) and changes in upland ground beetle assemblages and an increased prevalence of generalist species have been linked to decreasing maximum temperatures and increasing rainfall (Pozsgai et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, increasing ambient temperature has been shown to have contrasting phenological responses in plants and their Dipteran pollinators in arctic ecosystems, significantly reducing the amount of time during the flowering season that plants can be successfully pollinated (Hoye et al 2013). The consequences for any change in peak hoverfly abundance and species-richness driven by climate change is therefore unclear, for while phenological change in invertebrate taxa have been widely observed (Pozsgai & Littlewood 2011;Kuhlmann et al 2012), the implications for plant pollinator interactions are not well understood (Byers 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%