Changes in the phase morphology of miktoarm PS-b-PMMA copolymer induced by a monolayer surface

Abstract

It is known that polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks are immiscible at 383, 413, and 443 K and that their Flory-Huggins interaction parameters have the same blending ratio dependence at those temperatures. In this study, the phase morphologies of six groups of 12 miktoarm PS-b-PMMA copolymers were investigated at 383, 413, and 443 K via MesoDyn simulations. There is nearly no change for the same copolymer under different temperatures. We designed four series of patterned surfaces (18 total) and found that the inducing effect of these surfaces has some influence on the microscopic phase morphology of the polymers, including a reinforcing immiscible effect and a weakening immiscible effect. The degree of phase separation depended on the molecular architecture of the block copolymers, temperature, and the characteristics of the inducing surfaces. Higher temperature and higher PS-rich component copolymers exhibited higher order parameters. The co-4432 and co-8832 surfaces exhibited the most intensive inducing effect because of their 16 and 32 independent micro-environments, respectively. A set of comparative simulations was carried out with a high interaction energy between the polymeric species. The results confirmed the possibility of forming a hexagonal columnar phase with a core shell composed of the designed molecular structures as well as demonstrated the potential application of micro-environments in producing special mesoscopic structures.

Solvent Effect on the Self-Assembly of a Thin Film Consisting of Y-Shaped Copolymer

“…Among a large variety of copolymers, amphiphilic copolymers composed of hydrophilic and hydrophobic components are promising and useful candidates in a rich variety of applications, such as chiral separation membranes [ 25 ], drug release systems [ 26 ], antifouling coatings [ 27 ], gas and biosensors [ 28 ], and activating carriers for biocatalysts [ 29 ]. To advance the properties or to meet the requirements of device functionality, the aggregating structure or orientation at the mesoscopic scale are controlled by methodologies including the introduction of thermal annealing [ 30 ], external fields [ 31 , 32 ], solvent annealing [ 33 ], shear [ 34 , 35 ] and patterned substrates [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”

One-dimensional Confinement Effect on the Self-assembly of Symmetric H-shaped Copolymers in a Thin Film

“…A wide range of high-performance and functional block copolymer materials have been applied for use in electronics 3 , photonics 4 , biomaterials 5 and so on. To improve the material properties or to achieve the required device functionality, some methodologies have been utilized to control the orientation of block copolymer materials, including the introduction of external fields 6 , 7 , shear 8 , 9 , solvent annealing 10 , solvent 11 , 12 , thermal annealing 13 , and patterned substrates 14 – 26 . Among these approaches, spatial confinement provides a powerful and efficient method for the fabrication of ordered morphologies, which inspired us to explore the effect and mechanism of confinements with different acting distances and influencing areas on the self-assembly structure.…”