Changes in the Monitoring and Oversight Practices of Not-for-Profit Hospital Governing Boards 1989-2005

Abstract

Despite the legal and practical importance of monitoring and oversight of management by hospital governing boards, there is little empirical evidence of how hospital boards fulfill these roles and the extent to which these practices have changed over time. We utilize data from three national surveys of hospital governance to examine how oversight and monitoring practices in public and private not-for-profit (NFP) hospital boards have changed over time. Findings suggest that board relations with CEOs in NFP hospitals display important but potentially contradictory patterns. On the one hand, NFP hospital boards appear to be exercising more stringent oversight of management and hospital performance. On the other hand, management is more actively involved with governance matters with less separation of board and management. This general pattern varies by the dimension of oversight and monitoring practice and by specific characteristics of NFP hospitals.

Effective Governance and Hospital Boards Revisited: Reflections on 25 Years of Research

“…Hospitals with corporate-style boards are more prone to risk taking and business growth (Culica & Prezio, 2009). The corporate board model is associated with more changes in hospital service mix in response to external influences (Gautam & Goodstein, 1996), and hospitals with corporate boards are more likely to participate in positive organizational change including diversification and mergers, and less negative change such as closure (Alexander et al, 2006; Alexander, Lee, Wang, & Margolin, 2009).…”

“…Boards of nonprofit hospitals are engaged in more stringent monitoring and oversight practices. However, management is typically more actively involved in governance in these hospitals (Alexander et al, 2009).…”

Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field

“…The literature in high-income settings suggests that effective boards, as measured by the Board Self Assessment Questionnaire (BSAQ), are able to lower expenses and increase profitability in their hospitals; furthermore, hospital boards with more corporate configurations are less likely to experience closure [5,15,16]. We found, however, that although governing boards in Ethiopia had limited ability to control financial decisions (in comparison to their counterparts in high income countries), they nonetheless had significant influence on hospital operations.…”

Impact of Voluntary Accreditation on Short-Stay Rehabilitative Measures in U.S. Nursing Homes

“…They were subject to extensive testing, are derived from the minimum data set (MDS), are readily available, represent measures relevant to both consumers and providers, and the measures used here were developed specifically for short‐stay residents (Abt Associates Inc., ). Moreover, the quality measures are increasingly being used in empirical research (e.g., Alexander, Lee, Wang & Margolin, ).…”