2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Lémann Index Values During the First Years of Crohn’s Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(13) All the other studies of the Lémann Index are retrospective and the published methodology for calculating the Lémann Index was not applied. (10,14‐16) Our study, using the published methodology, confirms that the Lémann Index increases with disease duration by assessing irreversible bowel damage as well as the accumulation of stricturing lesions, penetrating lesions and surgical resections. (8) Our results confirm that the Lémann Index identifies disease progression and we also identified other factors associated with more extensive bowel damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(13) All the other studies of the Lémann Index are retrospective and the published methodology for calculating the Lémann Index was not applied. (10,14‐16) Our study, using the published methodology, confirms that the Lémann Index increases with disease duration by assessing irreversible bowel damage as well as the accumulation of stricturing lesions, penetrating lesions and surgical resections. (8) Our results confirm that the Lémann Index identifies disease progression and we also identified other factors associated with more extensive bowel damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As previously reported by Giletta et al, we confirmed that intestinal resection and a complicated CD phenotype were associated with higher Lémann Index scores. (14) Finally, we showed that exposure to immunosuppressants and anti‐TNF treatments were associated with more extensive bowel damage. These results are logical, suggesting that the most powerful treatments are used in patients with the most aggressive disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…While use of serological and genetic markers in prognostication has been hampered by lack of sensitivity and lack of wide availability, these are of increasing clinical interest. Indeed, composite scores incorporating clinical information and molecular profiling, and considering harder endpoints such as bowel damage 115,116 and disability, 117 will hopefully allow us to better personalize therapy in the future, both at diagnosis and throughout the disease course. 118 …”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is still debate regarding the content validity, inter rater reliability, ideal diagnostic modality for index calculation and efficient and effective incorporation of LI into clinical practice, LI has been shown to reflect disease course and shows worsening with persistent clinical activity (24) and improvement with anti-TNF therapy. (25) Change in LI or DLI has been demonstrated to be a useful tool to chart CD trajectory and segregate heterogeneous disease phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%