2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.760316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Fermentation and Bacterial Community by Artificial Saliva pH in RUSITEC System

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to assess the artificial saliva (AS) pH on ruminal fermentation and rumen bacteria community in the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. The experiment was performed in two treatments (low AS pH vs. high AS pH) with four replicates. The low AS pH was sustained by altering the composition of the AS (NaHCO3 from 9.8 to 1.96 g/L, Na2HPO4 from 9.3 to 1.86 g/L) according to McDougall's method. The diets were supplemented with 16 g basic diets with forage to the concentrate ratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(87 reference statements)
4
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low AS pH group significantly decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria from 14.6% to 0.96% compared with the high AS pH group, which was an agreement with Mao et al [3], who found that feeding SARA diets in cattle decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria. Nevertheless, this is in contrast with findings of Guo et al [42], who found that the abundance of Proteobacteria was greater in low AS pH at 6.02 in RUSITEC system. Combined with other studies, the results indicated that Proteobacteria was more sensitive to rumen pH; the growth and activity of Proteobacteria was inhibited by low AS pH 5.5, while it increased in low AS pH 6.02.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Low AS pH group significantly decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria from 14.6% to 0.96% compared with the high AS pH group, which was an agreement with Mao et al [3], who found that feeding SARA diets in cattle decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria. Nevertheless, this is in contrast with findings of Guo et al [42], who found that the abundance of Proteobacteria was greater in low AS pH at 6.02 in RUSITEC system. Combined with other studies, the results indicated that Proteobacteria was more sensitive to rumen pH; the growth and activity of Proteobacteria was inhibited by low AS pH 5.5, while it increased in low AS pH 6.02.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The molar proportion of propionate was decreased in the low AS pH group, but the molar proportion of acetate was not affected, which resulted in increasing the ratio of acetate to propionate. These results are similar to an earlier study in our lab [42]. The difference in the molar proportion of propionate may be relate to the reduction of starch digestion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation in the present study was the dosage of AOC. Due to the stability of the microbial community in the rumen ( 34 ), the results of β-diversity were also understandable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%