2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the concentrations of major, minor and rare-earth elements during leaf senescence and decomposition in a Fagus sylvatica forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
48
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of As, Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn in leaf litter collected from urban roads were higher than those found in forest beech litter ( [32], Table 1). While concentrations of As, Cr and Ni were about 6-to 9-fold higher, Pb concentration was 3-fold and Zn concentration was 1.5-fold higher.…”
Section: Heavy Metals In Urban Leaf Littermentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Concentrations of As, Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn in leaf litter collected from urban roads were higher than those found in forest beech litter ( [32], Table 1). While concentrations of As, Cr and Ni were about 6-to 9-fold higher, Pb concentration was 3-fold and Zn concentration was 1.5-fold higher.…”
Section: Heavy Metals In Urban Leaf Littermentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This might be explained by a higher contamination with soil and dirt particles due to the location and technique of collection, especially in the case of Na and Cl by contamination due to salt application for de-icing streets in autumn and winter time. Clean forest leaf litter investigated by Tyler [20] in a southern Swedish natural beech forest undisturbed for at least 50 years, collected with nets above ground, showed lower values for all elements but still an inherent level of ash of 5.28% DM. The ash concentration and mineral composition in a high quality standard fuel such as beech wood is significantly lower, with total ash values around 0.5% DM.…”
Section: Chemical Composition and Fuel Properties Of Leaf Littermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Killingbeck (1985) observed chinquapin oak in a gallery forest in Kansas resorbed 35% of its foliar Fe: however, he also observed that hackberry and red elm had significant accretion of Fe, while green ash and bur oak had neither significant resorption nor accretion. Tyler (2005) showed that most mineral elements, including Fe, increased in dry weight concentration during leaf senescence in European beech trees. For calculation and comparison purposes, we assumed that little change in foliar Fe content occurred during senescence.…”
Section: Relation Of Iron Chemistry To Dissolved Organic Carbon and Phmentioning
confidence: 99%