2017
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the area of permanent grassland and its implications for the provision of bioenergy: Slovakia as a case study

Abstract: Throughout Europe, grasslands are managed primarily for agricultural production but also provide a range of ecosystem services, the magnitude of which is influenced by their area, management and the abiotic properties of the ecosystem. The grassland area in Europe has been affected by significant changes in recent decades, including abandonment and conversion to arable land. This study presents an assessment of changes in the permanent grassland area with reference to Slovakia and provides an assessment of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In mountain areas, grasslands allow for the subsistence of dairy farms by providing much of the ruminants’ feed. Mountain dairy farms are widely recognized as providing a so-called ‘ecosystem service’ to society [4]. Indeed, they have a role in carbon sequestration, in soil fertility, in cultural heritage maintenance, and in fire hazard prevention [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mountain areas, grasslands allow for the subsistence of dairy farms by providing much of the ruminants’ feed. Mountain dairy farms are widely recognized as providing a so-called ‘ecosystem service’ to society [4]. Indeed, they have a role in carbon sequestration, in soil fertility, in cultural heritage maintenance, and in fire hazard prevention [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grassland surplus has the potential for biogas production. A recent study declared that the use of grassland biomass for biogas production is consistent with supporting ecosystem services provision (Kizeková et al, 2018). The area of the sampled farms did not significantly change in the period 2004 -2016 (p = 0.2803 > 0.05), thus the biogas plants have not significantly impacted on land area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The cartographic basis for agroecosystem evaluation and mapping units was the LPIS (Land Parcel Identification System) layer (https://podnemapy.vupop.sk). For spatial quantifying of regulating agroecosystem services of used agricultural land in Slovakia, we have created a mapping unit combining four input layers: climatic region (four categoriesmoderately cold, moderately warm, warm and very warm [27], slope topography (four categories 0-2º, 2.1º-5º,5.1º-12º, more than 12º), soil texture (three categories) and land use (arable land, grassland and other cultures (orchards, vineyards, hops fields)). The layer for evaluating and mapping agroecosystem services is the result of a combination of all four layers, creating 100 functional aggregate units.…”
Section: Mapping Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%