2021
DOI: 10.2147/nss.s294409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Subjective Motivation and Effort During Sleep Restriction Moderate Interindividual Differences in Attentional Performance in Healthy Young Men

Abstract: The effects of sleep restriction on subjective alertness, motivation, and effort vary among individuals and may explain interindividual differences in attention during sleep restriction. We investigated whether individuals with a greater decrease in subjective alertness or motivation, or a greater increase in subjective effort (versus other participants), demonstrated poorer attention when sleep restricted. Participants and Methods: Fifteen healthy men (M±SD, 22.3±2.8 years) completed a study with three nights… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(138 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that visually guided force control requires feedback-based motor corrections [40], the results suggest that for some individuals, feedback-based force control may be more sensitive to sleep restriction than memory-guided force control. The current study's findings of interindividual effects of sleep restriction on performance corroborate previous research using other cognitive tasks [7]. Future studies could explore the effect of sleep restriction as a longitudinal (over the 12 seconds of gripping) factor in multilevel models rather than as a categorical factor, to determine the potentially compounding effect of sleep loss on visually and memory-guided motor output across time.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that visually guided force control requires feedback-based motor corrections [40], the results suggest that for some individuals, feedback-based force control may be more sensitive to sleep restriction than memory-guided force control. The current study's findings of interindividual effects of sleep restriction on performance corroborate previous research using other cognitive tasks [7]. Future studies could explore the effect of sleep restriction as a longitudinal (over the 12 seconds of gripping) factor in multilevel models rather than as a categorical factor, to determine the potentially compounding effect of sleep loss on visually and memory-guided motor output across time.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As previously described [7,26], the current work was part of an 11-day inpatient study that followed a within-subjects design. Participants were admitted to the Clinical Research Center of the Pennsylvania State University at approximately 11:00 on admission day to a private, windowless room under constant (artificial) light levels (< 100 lux in the angle of gaze during wake; complete dark at 0 lux during scheduled sleep) and temperature conditions (20˚-22˚C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In PVT, napping improves alertness, most notably RT ( 40 , 41 ). Performance times decline through the post-lunch dip when no nap is taken ( 42 ), possibly due to “state instability,” or variability in alertness caused in part by rising homeostatic sleep pressure ( 43 , 44 ). However, in contrast to other studies, our findings did not find an increase in the proportion of lapses, indicating that the effect of nap deprivation on response time is more consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%