1992
DOI: 10.1139/b92-220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in species biomass in the Coastal Prairie of Texas when light and nutrients are altered

Abstract: 1992. Changes in species biomass in thc Coastal Prairic of Texas when light and nutrients are altered. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1777-1783. A 2 X 2 factorial experiment using light and nutrients as factors was carried out over 2 % years in a remnant, native Coastal Prairie of Texas. Light level, nutrient level, and date of sampling all had significant influences on total biomass, but changes were subtle, suggesting additional limiting factors. More obvious were changes in biomass of individual species, especially the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Present in the San Antonio grasslands in the past were Schizachyrium scoparium, Paspalum plicatulum and Sorghastrum nutans communities over Alifisol soils (Diamond and Smeins 1985). Two of these species (Schizachyrium scoparium and Sorghastrum nutans, but no Paspalum plicatulum or Andropogon gerardii) were found in the restored area of our study but at low cover compared to mature tallgrass prairie (Collins et al 1975;Sims 1988;Van Auken et al 1992a, 1992bDiggs et al 1999). These species were not present in the woodland understory adjacent to the restored area of the Park.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Present in the San Antonio grasslands in the past were Schizachyrium scoparium, Paspalum plicatulum and Sorghastrum nutans communities over Alifisol soils (Diamond and Smeins 1985). Two of these species (Schizachyrium scoparium and Sorghastrum nutans, but no Paspalum plicatulum or Andropogon gerardii) were found in the restored area of our study but at low cover compared to mature tallgrass prairie (Collins et al 1975;Sims 1988;Van Auken et al 1992a, 1992bDiggs et al 1999). These species were not present in the woodland understory adjacent to the restored area of the Park.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…2). However, some C 4 grasses established and further development and spread of these grasses is expected as succession continues (Sims 1988;Van Auken et al 1992a, 1992b Van Auken and Bush 2013). In the future, a variety of additional C 4 grasses should establish and those present will increase in cover, with a plateau of the C 4 grasses occurring between 10 and 20 years after the establishment on the restoration site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When S. scoparium was examined in common garden competition experiments, it was one of the strongest competitors [51], however, in field experiments it was one of the most suppressed species [51,61]. In unfertilized plots, belowground competition limited S. scoparium; while in fertilized field plots, both above-and belowground competition limited S. scoparium [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schizachyrium scoparium can reduce soil nitrate at shallow soil depths and in the middle of the growing season, thus deeper rooted and earlier growing species are more likely to be co-dominants [22]. Apparently S. scoparium is restricted to low productivity habitats or deeper soils [61][62][63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In common garden competition experiments, S. scoparium was one of the strongest competitors (see Wilson and Tilman, 2002), however in field experiments, S. scoparium was one of the most suppressed species (Van Auken et al, 1992a;see Wilson and Tilman, 2002). Competition experiments showed that in unfertilized plots belowground competition limited S. scoparium; while in fertilized field plots, both above-and belowground competition limited S. scoparium (see Wilson and Tilman, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%