2008
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Soil Water Content Resulting fromRicinusRoot Uptake Monitored by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to study the soil water content changes caused by root water uptake. A 4‐wk‐old Ricinus communis carmencita with a highly developed root system was planted in a cylindrical container filled with a model soil (99.5% fine sand, 0.5% clay), fully water saturated. The bottom and surface of the container were sealed so that water loss by factors other than transpiration via the leaves could be neglected. The water content of the soil was monitored for 3 wk using the MRI seq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, root architecture and hydraulic properties are more difficult to derive from in situ measurements of plant roots than rRLD. However, this type of information can be obtained from root growth models calibrated on root profile measurements (as done in this study) or from noninvasive methods like MRI (Pohlmeier et al, 2008), X-ray or neutron tomography (Menon et al, 2007). The sensitivity of SSF to the root architecture type should be characterised in the future.…”
Section: Emerging Macroscopic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, root architecture and hydraulic properties are more difficult to derive from in situ measurements of plant roots than rRLD. However, this type of information can be obtained from root growth models calibrated on root profile measurements (as done in this study) or from noninvasive methods like MRI (Pohlmeier et al, 2008), X-ray or neutron tomography (Menon et al, 2007). The sensitivity of SSF to the root architecture type should be characterised in the future.…”
Section: Emerging Macroscopic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques for the visualization of soilgrown root systems in two and three dimensions include x-ray computed tomography (Heeraman et al, 1997;Tracy et al, 2010;Mooney et al, 2012), neutron radiography (NR; Oswald et al, 2008), and magnetic resonance imaging (Pohlmeier et al, 2008). NR is one of the most suitable techniques to investigate roots grown in soil, because it allows a high throughput, provides a strong contrast between roots and soil, and therefore requires little effort for image processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other imaging techniques have been developed to visualise and quantify root properties in situ, including Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) (Rogers and Bottomley 1987;Jennette et al 2001), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (Pohlmeier et al 2008), Thermal Neutron Tomography (Tumlinson et al 2008) and Neutron Radiography . Like X-ray CT, each approach has a number of merits and some limitations when used to visualise root systems architecture, and particularly root systems architecture in soil.…”
Section: -D Visualisation Of Rooting Systems Using Other Nondestructmentioning
confidence: 99%