1980
DOI: 10.1079/bjn19800019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in skeletal muscle cellularity in starved and refed young rats

Abstract: I. All food was withdrawn from male weanling rats until a 40 % loss of body-weight was attained. Another group of animals was treated similarly and then refed a stock diet until the original body-weight was attained.2. The body-weight loss caused a significant reduction in the weight of the heart, kidney, liver and epididymal fat pads. Refeeding produced a return to the control weight of the heart and kidney, an increase in the weight of the liver and a deficit in the weight of the epididymal fat pads.3. Body-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1979] human [Cheek et al. 1970;Hansen-Smith et al, 1979;Montgomery, 1962] and rats [Hegarty and Kim, 1980;Layman et al, 1981]. This is, however, different from the observations of Rowe [1968] who even though he observed decrease in fibre diameter of the white fast muscles in starved mice did not observe any in the slow soleus muscle.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1979] human [Cheek et al. 1970;Hansen-Smith et al, 1979;Montgomery, 1962] and rats [Hegarty and Kim, 1980;Layman et al, 1981]. This is, however, different from the observations of Rowe [1968] who even though he observed decrease in fibre diameter of the white fast muscles in starved mice did not observe any in the slow soleus muscle.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The smaller number of muscle fibres present in the protein-malnourished mice cannot be as a result of all the muscle fibres not being counted as has been sug gested by Parsons et al [1982] to be responsible for the smaller number of muscle fibres observed in starved rats by Hegarty and Kim [1980] and Layman et al [1981] who employed the indirect method of fibre estimation of Thompson et al [1979). Rayne and Crawford [ 1975] stated that the best way to determine the number of muscle fibres is to choose a muscle small enough that cross-section through its midbelly will include all the fibres which can be counted directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soleus fiber diameters for the three restricted groups at 100 days were only slightly smaller. Hegarty and Kim (9) reported that refeeding after a 3-day starvation prompted complete recovery of muscle fiber diameter, but their restriction caused a rapid loss of body weight whereas the animals of the present study …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 36%
“…Later undernutrition may not cause such permanent deficit, since the number of muscle fibers is already fixed early in life (3,4) and is not changed thereafter. However, a decrease in the number of muscle fibers was observed during starvation which caused a 35-45% loss of body weight in postweaning and young rats (5). Exercise induced increases in muscle fiber number in cat (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found that undernutrition before weaning caused significant and permanent deficit in total fiber number. Even after weaning, starvation could cause a decrease in muscle fibers (5,15). Thus, dietary protein or energy restriction alone would not affect muscle fiber number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%