2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03232-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Sexual Behaviour Following PrEP Initiation Among Australian Gay and Bisexual Men in Relationships: Results from a Prospective Observational Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, PrEP users in relationships were much more likely to have a partner who also used PrEP (59% of PrEP users vs. 9% of non-users). This is consistent with previous research that found GBM in relationships who initiate PrEP are more likely to also have a partner who uses PrEP (Bavinton et al, 2021 ). Relatedly, most PrEP users (89%) in our sample reported that their partner knew they were taking PrEP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, PrEP users in relationships were much more likely to have a partner who also used PrEP (59% of PrEP users vs. 9% of non-users). This is consistent with previous research that found GBM in relationships who initiate PrEP are more likely to also have a partner who uses PrEP (Bavinton et al, 2021 ). Relatedly, most PrEP users (89%) in our sample reported that their partner knew they were taking PrEP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some research has reported changes to sexual practices among men in relationships after commencing PrEP. For example, an Australian cohort study of GBM found that men in relationships who initiated PrEP were much more likely to have a partner who also used PrEP, to have casual sex, and to report receptive condomless sex compared with non-PrEP-users (Bavinton et al, 2021 ). Other research has found that PrEP users tend to report more sexual partners and more condomless sex than GBM who do not use PrEP (e.g., MacGibbon et al, 2021 ; Traeger et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PrEP was associated with STI diagnosis in the simple, non-mediated model, in the mediated model, the direct path was not statistically significant. Our findings extend recent work showing that GBM who initiate PrEP use were significantly more likely to engage in CAS in the subsequent 6 months 11. Our study also extends previous literature focused on clinical cohorts of PrEP users or GBM presenting to STI clinics 7 8…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, in more recent research, PrEP initiation was associated with an increase in the proportion of GBM reporting never using condoms during anal sex as well as increases in the number of CAS partners 9 10. Other studies indicate that, as PrEP use increases, condom use simultaneously decreases 11. Although evidence has not been consistent on associations between PrEP and number of male sex partners,7 11 if PrEP is associated with an increased number of male sex partners, PrEP would also indirectly increase the likelihood of engaging in any sexual behaviour, including CAS and oral sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation