Changes in Self-Reported Knee Function and Health-Related Quality of Life After Knee Injury in Female Athletes

McGuine, Timothy A.; Winterstein, Andrew P.; Carr, Kathleen; Hetzel, Scott; Scott, Jessica

doi:10.1097/jsm.0b013e318257a40b

Cited by 28 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within-study comparisons between retrospectively collected pre-injury HRQL and general population norms indicated that self-reported pre-injury HRQL scores were consistently higher than population norm scores ( n = 3) [8, 29, 48]. Three studies found that scores were higher in either the physical domains ( n = 3) [20, 21, 28] or mental domains ( n = 1) [20] or in certain age or sex groups ( n = 1) [6].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 Adjusted by the age and sex distribution in the study population, based on the weighted health state index by age and sex [13, 14]. 2 Final post-injury measurement: at 3 [27], 6 [43] or maximal 9 months post-injury [18], 1 year post-injury [26, 28, 29, 32, 33, 48], 2 years post-injury [44], or 4 – 8 years post-injury [46]. Heterogeneity: PCS Chi 2 = 12.48, df = 11, ( p = 0.33), I 2 = 12%; MCS Chi 2 = 11.88, df = 11, ( p = 0.37), I 2 = 7%.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review

Scholten

Haagsma

Beeck

et al. 2017

Popul Health Metrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundInsight into the change from pre- to post-injury health-related quality of life (HRQL) of trauma patients is important to derive estimates of the impact of injury on HRQL. Prospectively collected pre-injury HRQL data are, however, often not available due to the difficulty to collect these data before the injury. We performed a systematic review on the current methods used to assess pre-injury health status and to estimate the change from pre- to post-injury HRQL due to an injury.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other databases. We identified studies that reported on the pre-injury HRQL of trauma patients. Articles were collated by type of injury and HRQL instrument used. Reported pre-injury HRQL scores were compared with general age- and gender-adjusted norms for the EQ-5D, SF-36, and SF-12.ResultsWe retrieved results from 31 eligible studies, described in 41 publications. All but two studies used retrospective assessment and asked patients to recall their pre-injury HRQL, showing widely varying timings of assessments (soon after injury up to years after injury). These studies commonly applied the SF-36 (n = 13), EQ-5D (n = 9), or SF-12 (n = 3) using questionnaires (n = 14) or face-to-face interviews (n = 11). Two studies reported prospective pre-injury assessment, based on prospective longitudinal cohort studies from a sample of initially non-injured patients, and applied questionnaires using the SF-36 or SF-12. The recalled pre-injury HRQL scores of injury patients consistently exceeded age- and sex-adjusted population norms, except in a limited number of studies on injury types of higher severity (e.g., traumatic brain injury and hip fractures). All studies reported reduced post-injury HRQL compared to pre-injury HRQL. Both prospective studies reported that patients had recovered to their pre-injury levels of physical and mental health, while in all but one retrospective study patients did not regain the reported pre-injury levels of HRQL, even years after injury.ConclusionsSo far, primarily retrospective research has been conducted to assess pre-injury HRQL. This research shows consistently higher pre-injury HRQL scores than population norms and a recovery that lags behind that of prospective assessments, implying a systematic overestimation of the change in HRQL from pre- to post-injury due to an injury. More prospective research is necessary to examine the effect of recall bias and response shift. Researchers should be aware of the bias that may arise when pre-injury HRQL is assessed retrospectively or when population norms are applied, and should use prospectively derived HRQL scores wherever possible to estimate the impact of injury on HRQL.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12963-017-0127-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review

Scholten

Haagsma

Beeck

et al. 2017

Popul Health Metrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After a significant time loss injury, athletes can suffer physically as well as emotionally with a decrease in quality of life measures 38 39. The emotional response to an ACL injury can be more significant than that experienced after concussion 40.…”

Section: Injuries: Problematic Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The psychological response to injury in student athletes: a narrative review with a focus on mental health

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundInjury is a major stressor for athletes and one that can pose significant challenges. Student athletes must handle rigorous academic as well as athletic demands that require time as well as significant physical requirements. Trying to perform and succeed in the classroom and on the playing field has become more difficult as the demands and expectations have increased. If an athlete is injured, these stressors increase.Main thesisStress is an important antecedent to injuries and can play a role in the response to, rehabilitation and return to play after injury. The psychological response to injury can trigger and/or unmask mental health issues including depression and suicidal ideation, anxiety, disordered eating, and substance use/abuse. There are barriers to mental health treatment in athletes. They often consider seeking help as a sign of weakness, feeling that they should be able to ‘push through’ psychological obstacles as they do physical ones. Athletes may not have developed healthy coping behaviours making response to injury especially challenging.PurposeI discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the psychological response to injury and delineate resources necessary to direct the injured athlete to a mental health care provider if appropriate.

show abstract

“…This effect has been demonstrated in joint replacement and spine disease as well as in a number of upper extremity disease states. 1,2,4,9,11,12,[18][19][20][21][22]25,29,30 In some cases, behavioral health interventions are even being offered in conjunction with treatment of the orthopedic condition or as a precondition for surgical treatment. 2,7 In the shoulder, numerous studies have documented the profound impact of biopsychosocial stressors, coping mechanisms, and pain catastrophizing on perception of shoulder pain and disability.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What factors are predictors of emotional health in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears?

Barlow

Bishop

Dunn

et al. 2016

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Changes in Self-Reported Knee Function and Health-Related Quality of Life After Knee Injury in Female Athletes

Abstract: In addition to negatively affecting knee function, sport medicine providers should be aware that knee injuries can negatively impact the health-related quality of life in these athletes immediately after injury.

Cited by 28 publications

References 30 publications

Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review

Assessment of pre-injury health-related quality of life: a systematic review

The psychological response to injury in student athletes: a narrative review with a focus on mental health

What factors are predictors of emotional health in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About