2015
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1019967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in self-efficacy and task value in online learning

Abstract: This study was designed to investigate whether course content self-efficacy, online technologies self-efficacy, and task value change over the course of a semester. Sixty-nine participating students from four classes provided data through two instruments: (1) the self-efficacy instrument and (2) the task value instrument. Students' self-efficacy and task value measures were collected three times during the semester (i.e., beginning of semester, mid-term, and final). Data were analyzed using repeated measures o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its antecedents and consequences in online distance education are less clear (Prior et al, 2016). In some studies, online learning also influenced learners' self‐efficacy in improving student learning outcomes and learning capacity (Lee, 2015). The higher the computer self‐efficacy, the higher is the satisfaction with online learning (Jan, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, its antecedents and consequences in online distance education are less clear (Prior et al, 2016). In some studies, online learning also influenced learners' self‐efficacy in improving student learning outcomes and learning capacity (Lee, 2015). The higher the computer self‐efficacy, the higher is the satisfaction with online learning (Jan, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with digital literacy, self‐efficacy is a predictor of learning motivation and achievement, and online self‐efficacy of college students affects emotions, perceived satisfaction, and knowledge perception as well as actual performance (Jan, 2015; Lee, 2015). College students' attitudes to online learning and digital literacy significantly contributed to self‐efficacy, which could have positive effects on peer participation, learning management system (LMS) interactions, and recruiter interactions (Prior, Mazanov, Meacheam, Heaslip, & Hanson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to situational interest, while self-efficacy is likely to fluctuate during tasks (Niemivirta and Tapola, 2007;Bernacki et al, 2015), it also shows relatively high rank-order stability (Ackerman et al, 1995;David et al, 2007), suggesting that initial self-efficacy contributes to subsequent confidence in a task. However, most studies have investigated the stability in self-efficacy over longer time periods (e.g., a course or a semester; Phan, 2012;Lee, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' pass rates are also lower in online courses than in face-to-face ones, which many put down to lower motivation and a feeling of not being 'connected' (Ali and Leeds, 2009;Richardson, 2012). This is where self-efficacy, meaningfulness and task value become important (Lee, 2015). Online courses also change the learning process (Alvarez et al, 2009;Helleve, 2007) and the preconditions for communication and interaction, such as the absence of paralinguistic cues in body language (Price et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%