2022
DOI: 10.1075/sar.21023.har
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in second-language learners’ oral skills and socio-affective profile following short-term study abroad to Japan

Abstract: Thirty-seven second language (L2) learners of Japanese (21 L1 English, 16 L1 Chinese) participated in an eight-week study abroad (SA) program to Japan. Pre- and post-SA oral proficiency interviews were used for ACTFL-level assessments and ratings of component skills (pronunciation, fluency, grammatical accuracy, vocabulary/content, interaction skills). Surveys measured socio-affective variables and L2 engagement (using a modified Language Contact Prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral production has been the most frequently investigated skill and, apart from vocabulary, the only domain for which there is an extensive body of research findings that, taken together, indicate that the SA context is more beneficial for oral proficiency gains than traditional AH instruction, even though not more beneficial than intensive AH instruction (Borràs & Llanes, 2021;Llanes, 2011). The constructs examined are varied and range from oral fluency (Freed, 1995;Freed et al, 2004;Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Juan-Garau & Pérez-Vidal, 2007;Valls-Ferrer & Mora, 2014;Yager, 1998), oral accuracy (e.g., Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Juan-Garau, 2014), pronunciation (Avello et al, 2012;Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Llanes, 2011;Muñoz & Llanes, 2014) to global measures of oral proficiency (Brecht et al, 1995;Jochum, 2014;Magnan & Back, 2007;, with positive effects having been found for most measures, even though results are contradictory as far as pronunciation is concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral production has been the most frequently investigated skill and, apart from vocabulary, the only domain for which there is an extensive body of research findings that, taken together, indicate that the SA context is more beneficial for oral proficiency gains than traditional AH instruction, even though not more beneficial than intensive AH instruction (Borràs & Llanes, 2021;Llanes, 2011). The constructs examined are varied and range from oral fluency (Freed, 1995;Freed et al, 2004;Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Juan-Garau & Pérez-Vidal, 2007;Valls-Ferrer & Mora, 2014;Yager, 1998), oral accuracy (e.g., Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Juan-Garau, 2014), pronunciation (Avello et al, 2012;Hardison, 2014;Hardison & Okuno, 2022;Llanes, 2011;Muñoz & Llanes, 2014) to global measures of oral proficiency (Brecht et al, 1995;Jochum, 2014;Magnan & Back, 2007;, with positive effects having been found for most measures, even though results are contradictory as far as pronunciation is concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%