Changes in risk perceptions during the 2014 Ebola virus disease epidemic: results of two consecutive surveys among the general population in Lower Saxony, Germany

Abstract

BackgroundThe Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak 2014 received extensive news media coverage, which faded out before the outbreak ended. News media coverage impacts risk perception; it is, however, unclear if the components of risk perception (affective and cognitive responses) change differently over time.MethodsIn an online panel, we asked participants (n = 1376) about EVD risk perceptions at the epidemic’s peak (November 2014) and after news media coverage faded out (August 2015). We investigated worry (affective response), perceived likelihood of infection, perceived personal impact, and coping efficacy (dimensions of cognitive response), and knowledge about transmission. Differences between the surveys with respect to manifestations of affective and cognitive dimensions were tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The association between individual change in knowledge and worries about EVD in the first survey was investigated using linear regression.ResultsIn November 2014, the survey was filled in by 974 participants. Ten months later, 662 of them were still members of the online panel and were invited to the follow-up survey. Among the 620 respondents, affective response decreased between the surveys. Knowledge about EVD also decreased; however, participants worried about EVD in 2014 had increased knowledge in 2015. Perceived likelihood of infection decreased over time, while perceived personal impact and coping efficacy did not.ConclusionsRisk communication appealing to cognitive reactions by informing clearly on the risk of infection in unaffected countries may decrease inappropriate behaviors.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5543-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Exploring stress coping strategies of frontline emergency health workers dealing Covid-19 in Pakistan: A qualitative inquiry

“…Various findings on epidemic such as Ebola and SARS have also shown that different kinds of noncompliance hampered the ability of governments and healthcare departments to work efficiently in dealing with the epidemics. 52,53 One of the reasons of this noncompliance as well as denial of severity of COVID-19 by religious scholars could be mistrust in government. Studies have shown that individuals who mistrusted in government were much less likely to abide by government-directed mechanisms formulated to deal with various epidemics.…”

Risk communication on behavioral responses during COVID-19 among general population in China: A rapid national study

“…7-11 However, these findings showed inconsistencies when researchers measured associations at different time of a public health emergency. 39 , 40 As risk perceptions are influenced by contextual factors, a looming threat causes risk perceptions to grow higher, especially when that threat is seen as uncontrollable or dreaded. 41 , 42 For example, Obenauer and colleagues found a decrease in perceived likelihood of infection from the peak to the end of the Ebola epidemic.…”

“… 41 , 42 For example, Obenauer and colleagues found a decrease in perceived likelihood of infection from the peak to the end of the Ebola epidemic. 40 Before the COVID-19 epidemic erupted in China, the whistleblower and news media described COVID-19 as a “SARS-like disease.” As China was stricken by the SARS epidemic in 2003, many Chinese citizens had high levels of risk perception toward such an infectious disease. 43 When the epidemic broke out, the government instituted a lockdown of Wuhan on Jan 23.…”

Social resistance drives persistent transmission of Ebola virus disease in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: A mixed-methods study

“…Support for incidents of overt hostility. Beyond non-compliance with public health recommendations, the current outbreak in Eastern DRC has witnessed acts of aggression toward health facilities and EVD response teams [21]. As a marker of sympathy or support for more extreme social resistance to control efforts, we evaluated respondents’ agreement with the statement “People are justified in resisting the EVD control efforts (e.g., throwing stones, destruction of hospital property, taking away infected bodies, or chasing away the vaccination team)” (5-point Likert scale).…”