2021
DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvab003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Relationships between the USDA Forest Service and Small, Forest-Based Communities in the Northwest Forest Plan Area amid Declines in Agency Staffing

Abstract: This article explores the changing relationships between the USDA Forest Service and 10 small, forest-based communities in the Northwest Forest Plan area in Washington, Oregon, and California. Interviews with 158 community members and agency personnel indicated that community member interviewees were largely dissatisfied with the agency’s current level of community engagement. Interviewees believed that loss of staff was the primary factor contributing to declining engagement, along with increasing turnover an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant to the US Forest Service, as they are the primary public agency responsible for managing RCW populations occurring on public lands. While RCW management protocols and objectives have not changed, the Forest Service has seen a steady decline in staff because of a paradigmatic shift towards wildfire suppression and other priorities [46,47]. This includes a 39% reduction in all non-fire personnel and a 41% increase in the annual budget towards wildland fire management by the Forest Service between 1995 and 2018 [46].…”
Section: Implications Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant to the US Forest Service, as they are the primary public agency responsible for managing RCW populations occurring on public lands. While RCW management protocols and objectives have not changed, the Forest Service has seen a steady decline in staff because of a paradigmatic shift towards wildfire suppression and other priorities [46,47]. This includes a 39% reduction in all non-fire personnel and a 41% increase in the annual budget towards wildland fire management by the Forest Service between 1995 and 2018 [46].…”
Section: Implications Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%