Changes in Producers' Perceptions of Within-Field Yield Variability after Adoption of Cotton Yield Monitors

Abstract

This article investigates how information from cotton yield monitors influences the perceptions of within-field yield variability of cotton producers. Using yield distribution modeling techniques and survey data from cotton producers in 11 southeastern states, we find that cotton farmers who responded to the survey tend to underestimate within-field yield variability (by approximately 5-18%) when not using site-specific yield monitor information. Results further indicate that surveyed cotton farmers who responded to a specific question about yield monitors place a value of approximately $20/acre/year (on average) on the additional information about within-field yield variability that the yield monitor technology provides.

Microeconomics of Deficit Irrigation and Subjective Water Response Function for Intensive Olive Groves

“…Rejesus et al [7] studied the spatial dimensions of yield variability and subjective perceptions. The paper by Griffiths et al [8] is one of the limited published works regarding the subjective input-yield relationship.…”

Farmer’s subjective elicited water response function for intensive olives and compromise programming method for irrigation supply decision

“…Clop-Gallart y Juárez-Rubio, 2007). Rejesus et al (2013) studied the spatial dimension of yield variability and the subjective perception. They found that the farmer's subjective view of within-field yield variability fundamentally affects input application decisions.…”