2006
DOI: 10.2744/1071-8443(2006)5[154:cipsod]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Population Structure of Diamondback Terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) in a Previously Surveyed Creek in Southern New Jersey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the overall status and trends of terrapin populations remain uncertain because few researchers have established estimates of population sizes (Bishop, 1983;Tucker et al, 2001;Mitro, 2003;Avissar, 2006). Consistent, long-term monitoring is needed to detect temporal changes in population sizes (Avissar, 2006), but using intensive present-day methods requires too much time, money, and sampling effort. Based on our results, we therefore recommend the development of an alternative monitoring program that relies on systematic head-count surveys to evaluate diamondback terrapin population trends over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the overall status and trends of terrapin populations remain uncertain because few researchers have established estimates of population sizes (Bishop, 1983;Tucker et al, 2001;Mitro, 2003;Avissar, 2006). Consistent, long-term monitoring is needed to detect temporal changes in population sizes (Avissar, 2006), but using intensive present-day methods requires too much time, money, and sampling effort. Based on our results, we therefore recommend the development of an alternative monitoring program that relies on systematic head-count surveys to evaluate diamondback terrapin population trends over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying and modeling environmental factors that influence spatiotemporal abundance patterns are key for more informative and useful estimates of population size, yet these factors are largely absent from DBT population studies. Population estimates of DBT are typically generated using capture–recapture methods (Avissar, 2006; Baxter et al, 2016; Butler, 2002; King & Ludlam, 2014). These methods generate valuable information on abundance, survivorship, and demography, but require substantial effort that often restricts sampling to only a few areas within the population region (Hart & McIvor, 2008; King & Ludlam, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying and modeling environmental factors that influence spatiotemporal abundance patterns are key for more informative and useful estimates of population size, yet these factors are largely absent from DBT population studies. Population estimates of DBT are typically generated using capture-recapture methods (Avissar, 2006;Baxter et al, 2016;Butler, 2002;King & Ludlam, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrapin populations have not fully recovered and are possibly declining because of continued harvest, incidental trapping, vehicle and boat strikes, predation, habitat loss, coastal development, and pollution [8,9]. The current status of terrapin populations is difficult to assess because there are few published studies containing terrapin population sizes [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%