2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11850-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in physiological states of Salmonella Typhimurium measured by qPCR with PMA and DyeTox13 Green Azide after pasteurization and UV treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Trieu & Lee, 2019). Given that dye‐based PCR detection is dependent on membrane permeability, this method may not be applicable for assessing bacteria inactivated by processing treatments that do not compromise membrane integrity (e.g., ultraviolet) (Li et al., 2022; Techathuvanan & D'Souza, 2020). Uptake of PMA by viable cells can also lead to false negative results (Emerson et al., 2017; Kumar & Ghosh, 2019).…”
Section: Nucleic Acid‐based Amplification Methods For Targeted Detect...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Trieu & Lee, 2019). Given that dye‐based PCR detection is dependent on membrane permeability, this method may not be applicable for assessing bacteria inactivated by processing treatments that do not compromise membrane integrity (e.g., ultraviolet) (Li et al., 2022; Techathuvanan & D'Souza, 2020). Uptake of PMA by viable cells can also lead to false negative results (Emerson et al., 2017; Kumar & Ghosh, 2019).…”
Section: Nucleic Acid‐based Amplification Methods For Targeted Detect...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the average ΔCt values of PCR reactions treated with the three dyes, there was no significant difference in the detection results, indicating that their ability to identify active bacteria in ordinary samples is equivalent. Li et al [ 16 ] detected viable and dead bacteria in UV disinfected samples using PMA-PCR and DyeTox13-PCR. Different from the results of the PMA test where only “membrane damaged” cells can be distinguished, the DyeTox13 test showed greater ability on “dormant” cells with no metabolic activity in eggshell samples, which was consistent with the results of plate counting, indicating it is more suitable to detect viable bacteria in samples after UV irradiation ( Figure 2 C).…”
Section: Dna-based Viability Pcr Detecting Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Schematic diagram of four nucleic acid intercalation dyes combined with PCR for distinguishing and detecting viable and dead bacteria. ( A ) Principal diagram of EMA-PCR for detecting viable and dead bacteria based on cell membrane integrity [ 10 ]; ( B ) Flow chart of multiple real-time detection of viable bacteria by PMA-PCR [ 14 ]; ( C ) Flow chart of DyeTox13-PCR detection of viable bacteria in sterilized samples [ 16 ]; ( D ) Principal diagram of TOMA-PCR for detecting viable and dead bacteria based on enzyme activity [ 18 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, a number of other methods had been developed for differentiating dead bacteria from live/dead cell mixtures, including electron microscopy, real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qPCR), surface-enhanced Raman scattering, aggregation-induced emission (AIE), and fluorescent techniques combined with fluorescence spectra, , optical microscopy, or flow cytometry (FCM). , However, none of these techniques meets the requirements of both high sensitivity and fast detection. For instance, fluorescence spectra can hardly determine the accurate death rate of bacteria that are treated by antibiotics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%