Sweet, Reinforced and Fortified Wines 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118569184.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Physical and Mechanical Properties of Dehydrating Berries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results clearly confirm that grape genotypes are characterised by differences in microstructural features of the skin, which most likely affect specific physical and mechanical properties of the outer layers of berries (Gabler et al, 2003;Rolle and Gerbi, 2013).…”
Section: Berry Outer and Inner Characteristics At Harvestsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These results clearly confirm that grape genotypes are characterised by differences in microstructural features of the skin, which most likely affect specific physical and mechanical properties of the outer layers of berries (Gabler et al, 2003;Rolle and Gerbi, 2013).…”
Section: Berry Outer and Inner Characteristics At Harvestsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Corvina berries, which are large and have thick skins with compact layers, lost the least weight after harvest, whereas the smaller Syrah berries with their thin skins lost weight the most rapidly. Few studies have linked berry morphological features, such as size and skin texture parameters, with the dehydration rate (Barbanti et al, 2008;Rolle et al, 2011;Giacosa et al, 2012;Rolle and Gerbi, 2013). In this context, our data indicate that berry morphological features that potentially influence water loss may have a major impact on the extent of dehydration stress.…”
Section: Differences In Water Loss Kinetics May Reflect the Distinct mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…2). Indeed, water availability appears to influence the grape skin physical features, especially in the period before the harvest 56 . After the withering process, F sk tended to increase, even if the differences among treatments resulted statistically significant only in a few cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, water availability appears to influence the grape skin physical features, especially in the period before the harvest. 56 After the withering process, F sk tended to increase, even if the differences among treatments resulted statistically significant only in a few cases. However, this phenomenon was more evident in berry skin break energy (W sk ), confirming that previously reported in the literature.…”
Section: Grape Skin Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 90%