2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2839630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Persistence of Performance Over Time

Abstract: One of the central puzzles of strategy is the persistence of performance. We revisit a research tradition that lays out trends in persistence of performance, to create shared facts for strategy scholars to explain. We extend the time series from prior studies and apply recent methods for measuring performance persistence. We show that persistence of performance is not stable. Notably, our measure shows a decrease in persistence from the beginning of the sample to roughly 2000, followed by a marked increase the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Lo [14], Jacobsen [15], Berg and Lyhagen [16], Crato and Ray [17], Batten et al [18] and Serletis and Rosenberg [19], Lu and Perron [20] did not find long-memory properties in financial series. A possible reason for such different findings is that the degree of persistence might change over time as argued by Corazza and Malliaris [21], Glenn [22] and Bennett and Gartenberg [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Lo [14], Jacobsen [15], Berg and Lyhagen [16], Crato and Ray [17], Batten et al [18] and Serletis and Rosenberg [19], Lu and Perron [20] did not find long-memory properties in financial series. A possible reason for such different findings is that the degree of persistence might change over time as argued by Corazza and Malliaris [21], Glenn [22] and Bennett and Gartenberg [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I first include both one and two‐year lags of firm performance, as mean reversion takes place over the span of 2–3 years (McGahan & Porter, ). Given the autoregressive model that includes lagged values of the dependent variable, I exclude firm fixed effects and estimate a random‐effects model (Bennett & Gartenberg, ; Villalonga, ) due to the well‐known downward bias (Nickell, ). Third, I winsorize ROA at the top and bottom three percentile given the high skew, but winsorizing at the top one or two percentile yields consistent but slightly less sharp results while winsorizing at the top five percentile yields consistent and stronger results (Appendix F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is calculated as the difference between firm performance ( P it ) and the industry benchmark ( IB it ), defined as the median ROA at the four‐digit SIC level. The subtraction follows prior research on the persistence of firm performance that adjusts for competitive benchmarks and industry‐level performance (e.g., Bennett & Gartenberg, ; McGahan & Porter, ; Villalonga, ) . For an analysis that separates positive and negative performance, I spline industry‐adjusted ROA into two parts: Positive Peformance it and Negative Performance it .…”
Section: Data and Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear time pattern stands out from this figure: λ (2) is lower in the decade 1995–2004 than in the decades before and after. This is consistent with both the findings of “hypercompetition” literature in the 2000s (e.g., D'Aveni et al, ), as well as recent findings of a reversion of this trend (Bennett & Gartenberg, ). Interestingly, the decline in persistence of profits in the decade 1995–2004 is almost exclusively in λ (2) (the persistence of profit growth ), rather than in λ (1) (the persistence of profit levels ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I find that higher‐order resources significantly affect profit persistence patterns and the resulting duration of competitive advantage across a wide range of industries. A notable exception is that the effect of higher‐order resources on profit persistence patterns is much smaller, or even absent in some industries, in the decade 1995–2004, providing an explanation for the findings of “hypercompetition” literature in the 2000s (e.g., D'Aveni, Dagnino, & Smith, ), as well as more recent findings of a reversion of this trend (e.g., Bennett & Gartenberg, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%