Changes in Optimal Stimulation Frequency with Time for Gait Disturbances in Patients with PD after STN-DBS—A Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Aim: To assess the changes in frequency parameters of STN-DBS stimulation over 6 months required to optimize gait in PD patients. Methods: It’s a single center, open label longitudinal study of PD patients after STN-DBS with gait disorders. Gait assessment using stand–walk–sit (SWS) test and freezing of gait (FOG) scores were done at baseline and after 6 months. Gait was assessed in five frequencies settings, that is, 60 Hz, 90 Hz, 130 Hz, 180 Hz and stimulation “OFF” during medication ON state. Voltage was maintained. Results: Fifteen post-deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients were included. Mean duration after surgery was 3.73 ± 2.82 years. In SWS and FOG at baseline, five patients have good response at 180 Hz frequency, five at 130 Hz, one at 90 Hz, two patients at 60 Hz, one both 60 and 90 Hz, and one at both 90 and 180 HZ. And after 6 months out of the 13 patients who were able to perform the test, four patients had good response at 180 Hz frequency, four at 130 Hz, two at 90 Hz, one each for 60 Hz and battery OFF state, and one for both 130 Hz and 180 Hz. At 6 months, four patients had good response at the same frequency as baseline, while 11 patients have change in frequency from baseline. Conclusion: Optimal frequency for gait varies in patients—both low and high frequency may be useful. Optimal frequency for improving gait changes over period of time. Regular assessment and changing frequency may improve gait after DBS.

Frequency of Stimulation: The Most Important DBS Parameter in Improvement of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease

“…Although most of the studies have confirmed the benefits of low-frequency stimulation on FOG, it is unclear whether this benefit lasts longer. In the study by Huang C,[ 10 ] they assessed the changes in frequency parameters of STN-DBS stimulation over a period of 6 months that is required to optimize gait in PD patients.…”

“…In this study, as the voltage and pulse width were kept constant, the effect of DBS was most likely due to the frequency and could not be due to the spread of stimulation to adjacent areas. [ 10 ]…”