2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Neural Activity Underlying Working Memory after Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults

Abstract: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) may counter the impact of aging on cognition, but both the efficacy and neurocognitive mechanisms underlying CCT remain controversial. In this study, 35 older individuals were randomly assigned to Cogmed adaptive working memory (WM) CCT or an active control CCT, featuring five weeks of five ∼40 min sessions per week. Before and after the 5-week intervention, event-related potentials were measured while subjects completed a visual n-back task with three levels of demand (0-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that not only closed- but also open-skill exercise could facilitate the memory-related neural processing which is involved in categorizing incoming information and updating the context of the working memory (e.g., encoding, rehearsal, recognition, and retrieval), due to the greater efficiency by which cognitive resources are allocated (Duncan-Johnson and Donchin, 1977 ; Donchin and Coles, 1988 ; Rugg, 1995 ). Although there were no significant between-group AR differences post-exercise among the three groups, the increase in exercise-induced P3 amplitudes observed in the two exercise groups after the 6-month interventions, as compared with the figures seen before training, could reveal that they allocated more resources for target classification and evaluation, which might result in higher ARs in the working memory task since larger overall P3 amplitudes during the N-back could be associated with better task performance in older adults (Tusch et al, 2016 ). However, the P3 amplitude could be influenced by a greater latency jitter of P3 in the high than in the low memory condition (Kok, 2001 ), and regular exercise could change P3 latency in the older adults (see review, Hillman et al, 2003 ), the potential response jitter thus needs to be clarified in further investigations, since different conditions in the two cognitive tasks are involved in different cognitive loads in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that not only closed- but also open-skill exercise could facilitate the memory-related neural processing which is involved in categorizing incoming information and updating the context of the working memory (e.g., encoding, rehearsal, recognition, and retrieval), due to the greater efficiency by which cognitive resources are allocated (Duncan-Johnson and Donchin, 1977 ; Donchin and Coles, 1988 ; Rugg, 1995 ). Although there were no significant between-group AR differences post-exercise among the three groups, the increase in exercise-induced P3 amplitudes observed in the two exercise groups after the 6-month interventions, as compared with the figures seen before training, could reveal that they allocated more resources for target classification and evaluation, which might result in higher ARs in the working memory task since larger overall P3 amplitudes during the N-back could be associated with better task performance in older adults (Tusch et al, 2016 ). However, the P3 amplitude could be influenced by a greater latency jitter of P3 in the high than in the low memory condition (Kok, 2001 ), and regular exercise could change P3 latency in the older adults (see review, Hillman et al, 2003 ), the potential response jitter thus needs to be clarified in further investigations, since different conditions in the two cognitive tasks are involved in different cognitive loads in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the two cognitive tasks on the P3 component in the elderly were clearly visible in the frontal-parietal regions of the scalp in the current study (see also Kieffaber and Hetrick, 2005 ; Friedman et al, 2008 ; Baskin-Sommers et al, 2014 ). Three electrodes (Fz, Cz, Pz) were thus analyzed in the present work (Themanson et al, 2006 ; Tusch et al, 2016 ). P3 mean amplitudes were calculated for the time-window between 300 and 600 ms post stimulus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean reaction time (RT) was measured and ratios of target stimuli correctly responded to (target hits) and stimuli incorrectly identified as targets (false alarms) were calculated. Oddball performance was characterized by the nonparametric discrimination index (e.g., sensitivity) A’ and the A’ composite with RT have been used in studies of cognitive aging (Tusch et al, 2016b ; Vermeij et al, 2017 ). A’ is a behavioral performance variable derived from signal detection theory (Grier, 1971 ; Hannay, 1986 ) and ranges from 0.5 (chance level) to 1 (perfect discrimination between targets and non-targets).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target P3 in the task-relevant modality was measured, which indexes the process of categorizing an event (Squires et al, 1973 ; Kok, 2001 ) or updating memory after an event has been categorized (Donchin, 1981 ; Donchin and Coles, 1988 ; Polich, 1996 , 2007 ). Larger P3 amplitude indicates more cognitive resources committed to stimulus processing (Wickens et al, 1983 ; Polich, 1996 ) and has been shown to correlate with task performance in some studies (Walhovd and Fjell, 2003 ; Tusch et al, 2016b ). Of particular interest is the difference in P3 amplitude to visual targets preceded by auditory novels compared to visual targets preceded by repetitive auditory standards or no auditory stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported improved performance at a low difficulty level after the training period. Overall, current research on CIs is focusing on identifying more effective training parameters (Brehmer et al, 2011;Styliaidis et al, 2015), maintaining long-term persistence of the obtained benefits (Boyke et al, 2008;Lövdén et al, 2012), and studying transfer effects to untrained abilities (Anguera et al, 2013;Berry et al, 2010;Dahlin et al, 2008;Tusch et al, 2016;Wolf et al, 2014).…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Interventions To Improve Cognition In Hementioning
confidence: 99%