1976
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in nasal airway resistance associated with rapid maxillary expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
108
0
36

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
108
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Adenoidian facies was already well described in the 19th century, and between 1960 and 1980, Swedish and UK orthodontists emphasized the role of mouth breathing and enlarged tonsils and adenoid in cranial facial changes [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adenoidian facies was already well described in the 19th century, and between 1960 and 1980, Swedish and UK orthodontists emphasized the role of mouth breathing and enlarged tonsils and adenoid in cranial facial changes [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion facilitates posterior crossbite correction, relief of crowding, increase in airway dimensions and has been used in conjunction with facemask therapy to facilitate maxillary advancement. [1][2][3] The dental and skeletal effects of RME are well documented in the literature. The main skeletal effects produce separation of the mid-palatal suture, more anteriorly then posteriorly, with vertical expansion extending to varying levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] RME is usually used to correct crossbite and to eliminate crowding by increasing the maxillary arch circumference, and it may improve nasal respiration. 2,[10][11][12] However, problems such as dental and/or alveolar tipping, periodontal (gingival) recession, dental extrusion, and anterior open-bite are common concerns. [13][14][15] Traditionally, the effects of RME are evaluated using casts and/or two-dimensional (2D) radiographs, but reproducibility of 2D radiographs is problematic, and overlapping images are difficult to assess.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%