1997
DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-75-9-1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in myocardial density during postinfarction healing: effect on estimation of in vivo left ventricular mass by echocardiographic imaging

Abstract: To determine whether changes in density (rho) of infarct and noninfarct zones during healing and remodeling after myocardial infarction influence estimates of left ventricular mass and detection of temporal changes by imaging, we measured weights (g) and volumes (mL) of infarct, noninfarct, and mixed tissue in hearts removed 1 to 42 days after anterior infarction in three groups of dogs: nonreperfused infarction treated with placebo or captopril, or infarcts reperfused after 2 h. In vivo mass was calculated fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main objective of the present study was to demonstrate that MCF, even if measured with the simplest method, can predict adverse outcomes. Additionally, measurement of MV relied on assuming a consistent myocardial density of 1.04g/mL regardless of amyloid presence, which is unlikely since myocardial density is known to vary with other conditions such as after infarction, when density has been shown to increase [52]. Finally, lacking data in the THAOS database on other known predictors of outcomes in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis, including strain [31-33], tricuspid phase annular plane systolic excursion [35], left atrial volume and function [53], and Left ventricular wall thickness [54], precluded their direct comparison with MCF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main objective of the present study was to demonstrate that MCF, even if measured with the simplest method, can predict adverse outcomes. Additionally, measurement of MV relied on assuming a consistent myocardial density of 1.04g/mL regardless of amyloid presence, which is unlikely since myocardial density is known to vary with other conditions such as after infarction, when density has been shown to increase [52]. Finally, lacking data in the THAOS database on other known predictors of outcomes in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis, including strain [31-33], tricuspid phase annular plane systolic excursion [35], left atrial volume and function [53], and Left ventricular wall thickness [54], precluded their direct comparison with MCF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tissue structure [20][23] and density [24][26] have only a small amount of variation across species, can be expected to stain cardiac tissue in a similar way across species.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain MF mass, the MF volume was multiplied by myocardial-specific density, that is, 1.05 g/mL. 46 Percentage of MF was calculated as MF divided by LV mass. Basal and mid inferoseptal segments had significant metal artifacts in all patients and were excluded from analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%